Pseudo-shot Learning for Soil Classification With Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

被引:0
作者
Huang Y. [1 ]
Bais A. [1 ]
Hussein A.E. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Regina, Regina, S4S0A2, SK
[2] University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G2R3, AB
来源
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence | 2024年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
Artificial intelligence in agriculture; domain adaptation (DA); laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS); neural networks; pseudoshot learning; self-learning; Siamese networks; similarity learning; soil classification;
D O I
10.1109/TAI.2023.3262503
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) has become an emerging analytical technique for soil analysis. The application of machine learning for quantitative and qualitative analysis has made LIBS more promising. However, the emission line distribution can be highly variable due to the soil samples' varied physical properties and/or chemical composition. It may cause spectra distribution change and make the training spectra not accurately reflect the test spectra distribution. Hence, the test performance is deteriorated by applying an ML model trained on samples from the training distribution to the test distribution. To handle the spectra distribution problem, we propose using pseudoshot learning with Siamese networks, a domain adaptation (DA) method to incorporate pseudolabeled samples based on similarity confidence into the parameter estimation procedure. Considering the domain transfer differences among classes, we categorize the classes as hard, normal, and easy to reflect the class transfer difficulties in DA. We mainly focus on the hard classes as samples from these classes are not representative of the source domain and can easily be misclassified in the prediction phase. Few-shot learning is used to find the spectra from hard classes but misclassified into their similar classes. These spectra are included to cotrain the model with source samples to improve the test performance of hard classes. Our framework is tested with the EMSLIBS dataset, which shows that it can effectively overcome the spectra distribution shift and achieves 94.12% test accuracy. It beats the current best-performing model using the same dataset. © 2023 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 723
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Villas-Boas P.R., Franco M.A., Martin-Neto L., Gollany H.T., Milori D.M.B.P., Applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for soil analysis, Part I: Review of fundamentals and chemical and physical properties, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 71, 5, pp. 789-804, (2020)
[2]  
Huang Y., Harilal S.S., Bais A., Hussein A.E., Progress towards machine learning methodologies for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with an emphasis on soil analysis, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., to Be Published
[3]  
Babu M.S., Imai T., Sarathi R., Classification of aged epoxy micro-nanocomposites through PCA-and ANN-adopted LIBS analysis, IEEE Plasma Sci., 49, 3, pp. 1088-1096, (2021)
[4]  
Huang Y., Bais A., A novel PCA-based calibration algorithm for classification of challenging laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy soil sample data, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: At. Spectrosc., 193, (2022)
[5]  
Vinod P., Babu M.S., Sarathi R., Vasa N.J., Kornhuber S., Influence of standoff distance and sunlight on detection of pollution deposits on silicone rubber insulators adopting remote LIBS analysis, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 58, 3, pp. 3285-3293, (2022)
[6]  
Chen T., Zhang T., Li H., Applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) combined with machine learning in geochemical and environmental resources exploration, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., 133, (2020)
[7]  
Sun C., Et al., From machine learning to transfer learning in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of rocks forMars exploration, Sci. Rep., 11, 1, (2021)
[8]  
Cremers D.A., Radziemski L.J., Handbook of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy., (2013)
[9]  
Bhardwaj K., Gokhale M., Semi-supervised On-device Neural Network Adaptation for Remote and Portable Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, (2021)
[10]  
Bekker J., Davis J., Learning from positive and unlabeled data: A survey, Mach. Learn., 109, 4, pp. 719-760, (2020)