Prediction of oil flow rate through an orifice flow meter: Artificial intelligence alternatives compared

被引:29
|
作者
Ghorbani H. [1 ]
Wood D.A. [2 ]
Choubineh A. [3 ]
Tatar A. [4 ]
Abarghoyi P.G. [5 ]
Madani M. [3 ]
Mohamadian N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz
[2] DWA Energy Limited, Lincoln
[3] Petroleum Department, Petroleum University of Technology, Ahwaz
[4] Young Researchers and Elite Club, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
[5] National Iranian South Oil Company (NISOC), Ahvaz
[6] Young Researchers and Elite Club, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh
关键词
Flow-rate prediction error analysis; Flow-rate-predicting virtual meters; Metrics influencing oil flow; Multiple machine-learning algorithm comparisons; Orifice flow meters;
D O I
10.1016/j.petlm.2018.09.003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fluid-flow measurements of petroleum can be performed using a variety of equipment such as orifice meters and wellhead chokes. It is useful to understand the relationship between flow rate through orifice meters (Qv) and the five fluid-flow influencing input variables: pressure (P), temperature (T), viscosity (μ), square root of differential pressure (ΔP^0.5), and oil specific gravity (SG). Here we evaluate these relationships using a range of machine-learning algorithms applied to orifice meter data from a pipeline flowing from the Cheshmeh Khosh Iranian oil field. Correlation coefficients indicate that (Qv) has weak to moderate positive correlations with T, P, and μ, a strong positive correlation with the ΔP^0.5, and a weak negative correlation with oil specific gravity. In order to predict the flow rate with reliable accuracy, five machine-learning algorithms are applied to a dataset of 1037 data records (830 used for algorithm training; 207 used for testing) with the full input variable values for the data set provided. The algorithms evaluated are: Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Gene expression programming (GEP). The prediction performance analysis reveals that all of the applied methods provide predictions at acceptable levels of accuracy. The MLP algorithm achieves the most accurate predictions of orifice meter flow rates for the dataset studied. GEP and RBF also achieve high levels of accuracy. ANFIS and LSSVM perform less well, particularly in the lower flow rate range (i.e., <40,000 stb/day). Some machine learning algorithms have the potential to overcome the limitations of idealized streamline analysis applying the Bernoulli equation when predicting flow rate across an orifice meter, particularly at low flow rates and in turbulent flow conditions. Further studies on additional datasets are required to confirm this. © 2020
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 414
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of oil flow rate through an orifice flow meter: Artificial intelligence alternatives compared
    Hamzeh Ghorbani
    David AWood
    Abouzar Choubineh
    Afshin Tatar
    Pejman Ghazaeipour Abarghoyi
    Mohammad Madani
    Nima Mohamadian
    Petroleum, 2020, 6 (04) : 404 - 414
  • [2] Prediction of oil flow rate through an orifice flow meter: Artificial intelligence alternatives compared (vol 6, pg 404, 2019)
    Ghorbani, Hamzeh
    Wood, David A.
    Choubineh, Abouzar
    Tatar, Afshin
    Abarghoyi, Pejman Ghazaeipour
    Madani, Mohammad
    Mohamadian, Nima
    PETROLEUM, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [3] Prediction of oil flow rate through orifice flow meters: Optimized machine-learning techniques
    Farsi, Mohammad
    Barjouei, Hossein Shojaei
    Wood, David A.
    Ghorbani, Hamzeh
    Mohamadian, Nima
    Davoodi, Shadfar
    Nasriani, Hamid Reza
    Alvar, Mehdi Ahmadi
    MEASUREMENT, 2021, 174 (174)
  • [4] COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF FLOW RATE MEASUREMENTS USING AN ORIFICE FLOW METER
    Xu, YiQin
    Coxe, Daniel
    Peet, Yulia
    Lee, Taewoo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [5] Analysis of flow through an orifice meter: CFD simulation
    Shah, Manish S.
    Joshi, Jyeshtharaj B.
    Kalsi, Avtar S.
    Prasad, C. S. R.
    Shukla, Daya S.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2012, 71 : 300 - 309
  • [6] Predicting Oil Flow Rate due to Multiphase Flow Meter by Using an Artificial Neural Network
    Hasanvand, M.
    Berneti, S. M.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2015, 37 (08) : 840 - 845
  • [7] THE FLOW FIELD INSIDE AN ORIFICE FLOW METER
    MORRISON, GL
    DEOTTE, RE
    PANAK, DL
    NAIL, GH
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1990, 86 (07) : 75 - 80
  • [8] A variable orifice flow meter
    Marks, GW
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1932, 3 (12): : 764 - 765
  • [9] PROGRAM COMPUTES ORIFICE-METER FLOW-RATE
    MARTIN, JR
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1981, 79 (41) : 130 - 130
  • [10] The flow rate of granular materials through an orifice
    C. Mankoc
    A. Janda
    R. Arévalo
    J. M. Pastor
    I. Zuriguel
    A. Garcimartín
    D. Maza
    Granular Matter, 2007, 9 : 407 - 414