Options for estimating horizontal visibility in hemiboreal forests using sparse airborne laser scanning data and forest inventory data Horisontaalse nähtavuse hindamine poolboreaalses metsas hõredate laserskaneerimise andmete põhjal

被引:1
作者
Lang M. [1 ,2 ]
Vennik K. [3 ]
Põldma A. [3 ]
Nilson T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tartu Observatory, University of Tartu, Tõrevere, Tartumaa
[2] Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu
[3] Military Academy, Riia 12, Tartu
关键词
airborne lidar; forest; horizontal visibility; sparse point clouds; structural diversity;
D O I
10.2478/fsmu-2020-0019
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Horizontal visibility v in hemiboreal forest transects was measured in the field and then predicted, both from forest inventory (FI) data and from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. Stand density N and mean diameter at breast height D were used as arguments in an FI predictive model assuming Poisson distribution of trees on a horizontal plane. It was found that a lack of FI data on forest regrowth and understorey trees caused v to be overestimated. Point cloud metrics of sparse ALS data from summer 2017 and spring 2019 were used as predictive variables for v in regression models. The best models were based on three variables: the 10th percentile of the point cloud height distribution, relative density of returns in a horizontal layer ranging 0.7-2.2 m above the ground, and canopy cover. The models had a coefficient of determination of up to 67% and a residual standard error of less than 25 m. In forests in which fertile soil produces rapid height growth of understorey woody vegetation after recent thinning, visibility was found to be substantially overestimated because the understorey was not detected by the lidar measurements. © 2020 Mait Lang et al., published by Sciendo 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 135
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Adiceam F., How far can you see in a forest?, International Mathematics Research Notices, 2016, 16, pp. 4867-4881, (2016)
  • [2] Anstey R.L., Visibility measurements in forested areas, Special Report S-4, (1964)
  • [3] Arumae T., Lang M., Estimation of canopy cover in dense mixed-species forests using airborne lidar data, European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51, 1, pp. 132-141, (2018)
  • [4] NATO Standard No. 3.2.1: Allied Land Tactics. Edition B, Version 1, (2018)
  • [5] Chiang Y.-C., Nasar J.L., Ko C.-C., Influence of visibility and situational threats on forest trail evaluations, Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, pp. 166-173, (2014)
  • [6] Chmielewski S., Tompalski P., Estimating outdoor advertising media visibility with voxel-based approach, Applied Geography, 87, pp. 1-13, (2017)
  • [7] Drummond R.R., Lackey E.E., Visibility in some forest stands of the United States, Technical Report EP-36, (1956)
  • [8] Hofmeester T.R., Rowcliffe J.M., Jansen P.A., A simple method for estimating the effective detection distance of camera traps, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 3, 2, pp. 81-89, (2017)
  • [9] Korjus H., Pollumae P., Kiviste A., Kangur A., Laarmann D., Sirgmets R., Lang M., Online streaming public participation in forest management planning, Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 66, pp. 5-13, (2017)
  • [10] Lang M., Forest Reflectance Model As An Interface between Satellite Images and Forestry Database, (2001)