Open Knowledge Graph Representation Learning Based on Neighbors and Semantic Affinity

被引:0
作者
Du Z. [1 ]
Du Z. [1 ]
Wang L. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Computer Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot
[2] College of Information, North China University of Technology, Beijing
[3] Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing
来源
Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development | 2019年 / 56卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Knowledge graph; Neighbors; Open-world assumption; Representation learning; Semantic affinity;
D O I
10.7544/issn1000-1239.2019.20190648
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge graph (KG) breaks the data isolation in different scenarios and provides basic support for the practical application. The representation learning transforms KG into the low-dimensional vector space to facilitate KG application. However, there are two problems in KG representation learning: 1)It is assumed that KG satisfies the closed-world assumption. It requires all entities to be visible during the training. In reality, most KGs are growing rapidly, e.g. a rate of 200 new entities per day in the DBPedia. 2)Complex semantic interaction, such as matrix projection and convolution, are used to improve the accuracy of the model and limit the scalability of the model. To this end, we propose a representation learning method TransNS for open KG that allows new entities to exist. It selects the related neighbors as the attribute of the entity to infer the new entity, and uses the semantic affinity between the entities to select the negative triple in the learning phase to enhance the semantic interaction capability. We compare our TransNS with the state-of-the-art baselines on 5 traditional and 8 new datasets. The results show that our TransNS performs well in the open KGs and even outperforms existing models on the baseline closed KGs. © 2019, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2549 / 2561
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Liu Q., Li Y., Duan H., Et al., Knowledge graph construction techniques, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 53, 3, pp. 582-600, (2016)
[2]  
Meng X., Du Z., Research on the big data fusion: Issues and challenges, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 53, 2, pp. 231-246, (2016)
[3]  
Liu Z., Sun M., Lin Y., Et al., Knowledge representation learning: A review, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 53, 2, pp. 247-261, (2016)
[4]  
Wang Q., Mao Z., Wang B., Et al., Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29, 12, pp. 2724-2743, (2017)
[5]  
Bordes A., Usunier N., Garcia-Duran A., Et al., Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data, Proc of the 27th Annual Conf on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'13), pp. 2787-2795, (2013)
[6]  
Trouillon T., Dance C.R., Gaussier E., Et al., Knowledge graph completion via complex tensor factorization, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18, 1, pp. 4735-4772, (2017)
[7]  
Dettmers T., Minervini P., Stenetorp P., Et al., Convolutional 2D knowledge graph embeddings, Proc of the 32nd AAAI Conf on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'18), pp. 1811-1818, (2018)
[8]  
Reiter R., On closed world data bases, Proc of Logic and Data Bases, Symp on Logic and Data Bases, pp. 55-76, (1977)
[9]  
The DBpedia data set
[10]  
Lin Y., Liu Z., Sun M., Et al., Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion, Proc of the 29th AAAI Conf on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'15), pp. 2181-2187, (2015)