Improvement of robot kinematic accuracy based on BAS-PSO algorithm

被引:0
作者
Qiao G.-F. [1 ,2 ]
Lü Z.-Y. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Song G.-M. [2 ]
Song A.-G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Automation Department, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing
[2] School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
来源
Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering | 2021年 / 29卷 / 04期
关键词
Accuracy performance; Beetle antennae search algorithm; Geometric parameters; Industrial robot; Robot calibration;
D O I
10.37188/OPE.20212904.0763
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, a method to improve robot positioning accuracy was proposed, given that the accuracy performance of industrial robots still does not satisfy the requirements of high-end manufacturing. First, a kinematics error model based on pose differential transformation and kinematics error model based on coordinate error transformation were summarized. Second, a kinematic parameters identification method based on BAS-PSO algorithm was proposed. Finally, accuracy characteristics of different error models were compared and analyzed via experiments. The experimental results indicate that the average comprehensive position/attitude error of the TX60 robot, after identification by the proposed algorithm, decreases from (0.312 mm, 0.221°) to (0.093 8 mm, 0.044 2°). The average position error and average attitude error of the robot after direct identification based on the forward kinematics model correspond to 0.097 5 mm and 0.098 6°, respectively. The BAS-PSO algorithm proposed in the study displays good performance in terms of identification accuracy and convergence speed. Furthermore, robot kinematic parameters directly identified by the forward kinematics model exhibit better identification stability and accuracy. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 771
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] MEJRI S, GAGNOL V, LE T P, Et al., Dynamic characterization of machining robot and stability analysis, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82, 1, pp. 351-359, (2016)
  • [2] JIAO J C, TIAN W, LIAO W H, Et al., Processing configuration off-line optimization for functionally redundant robotic drilling tasks, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 110, pp. 112-123, (2018)
  • [3] YANG SH R, YIN SH B, REN Y J, Et al., Improvement of calibration method for robotic flexible visual measurement systems, Opt. Precision Eng, 22, 12, pp. 3239-3246, (2014)
  • [4] NUBIOLA A, BONEV I A., Absolute calibration of an ABB IRB 1600 robot using a laser tracker, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29, 1, pp. 236-245, (2013)
  • [5] ZHU J G, ZHANG N N, REN Y J, Et al., In-line thermal compensation of industrial robots based on binocular stereo vision, Opt. Precision Eng, 26, 9, pp. 2139-2149, (2018)
  • [6] JUDD R P, KNASINSKI A B., A technique to calibrate industrial robots with experimental verification, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 6, 1, pp. 20-30, (1990)
  • [7] XU Y D, WANG CH, ZHAO CH L, Et al., Parameter calibration of five-degree-of-freedom hybrid robot 2RPU/UPR+RP, Opt. Precision Eng, 28, 1, pp. 119-129, (2020)
  • [8] SANTOLARIA J, CONTE J, GINES M., Laser tracker-based kinematic parameter calibration of industrial robots by improved CPA method and active retroreflector, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66, 9, pp. 2087-2106, (2013)
  • [9] CHEN -GANG, LI -TONG, CHU -MING, Et al., Review on kinematics calibration technology of serial robots, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 8, pp. 1759-1774, (2014)
  • [10] HONG P, TIAN W, MEI D Q, Et al., Robotic variable parameter accuracy compensation using space grid, Robot, 37, 3, pp. 327-335, (2015)