Spatial Characteristics of Comprehensive Transportation Green Efficiency in China

被引:0
作者
Ma Q.-F. [1 ,2 ]
Jia P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kuang H.-B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Maritime Economices and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Liaoning, Dalian
[2] Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Liaoning, Dalian
[3] School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
来源
Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology | 2022年 / 22卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
comprehensive transportation green efficiency; Dagum Gini coefficient; integrated transportation; Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model; spatial characteristics;
D O I
10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2022.06.030
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper introduces the social development index (SDI) into the evaluation framework of comprehensive transportation green efficiency (CTGE), and uses the SBM model, Dagum Gini Coefficient and the data from 30 regions in China to estimate and explore the CTGE and its spatial characteristics. The results indicate that: the social development index can significantly improve the CTGE, but the overall level of CTGE in China was relatively low, with great regional differences and obvious spatial imbalance. The spatial disequilibrium of CTGE had obvious stage characteristics, and the regional differences gradually expanded in the initial stage of the study, but gradually shrunk in the later stage of the study. The overall CTGE in China was different among regions. Intra-regional differences was the largest in the west and the smallest in the east, and was the main source of total disparity. At last, some relevant policy suggestions are proposed based on the research conclusions. © 2022 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] CAO W H, ZHANG X Y., History, theory and practice: The triple logic of interpreting the strategy of building China's strength in transportation, Social Science Research, 2021, 3, pp. 34-40
  • [2] SONG J N, WU Q Q, SUN Q P, Et al., SBM-undesirable model-based efficiency evaluation for integrated transportation, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 15, 5, pp. 32-38, (2015)
  • [3] LI L C., Connotation and evaluation index system for building China's strength in transportation, Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 19, 2, pp. 12-19, (2020)
  • [4] JING C Y, SONG H J, SUN H., Airport capacity expansion and efficiency change in China based on two stage analysis of DEA-Tobit/Logit method, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 17, 5, pp. 235-241, (2017)
  • [5] JIA P, HU Y, YUAN S, Et al., A research on the comprehensive transportation efficiency and its spatial relevancy in China's provinces, Science Research Management, 41, 9, pp. 219-229, (2020)
  • [6] ZHU S Y, LIAO L Y, WU J A, Et al., Difference in carbon emission efficiency of urban passenger transportation modes: A case of Xiangyang city, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 22, 4, pp. 158-166, (2022)
  • [7] JIANG X H, CHEN S, ZHANG Y., Calculation method of total carbon emission and efficiency of logistics enterprises, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 22, 2, pp. 313-321, (2022)
  • [8] ZHANG J B, CHEN Q L., Analysis of spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factor in regional integrated transport efficiency differences, Journal of Guizhou University (Social Sciences), 37, 6, pp. 34-42, (2019)
  • [9] MA Q F, JIA P, KUANG H B., Green efficiency changes of comprehensive transportation in China: Technological change or technical efficiency change?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, (2021)
  • [10] MA Q F, JIA P, SUN C Z, Et al., Dynamic evolution trend of comprehensive transportation green efficiency in China: From a spatio-temporal interaction perspective, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32, 3, pp. 477-498, (2022)