Adaptive evolution mechanism of rural human-land system in farming-and-pastoral areas of northern China

被引:0
|
作者
Li W. [1 ,2 ]
Kuang W. [2 ]
Lyu J. [1 ]
Zhao Z. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Resources and Environmental Economics, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Economic Data Analysis and Mining, Hohhot
[2] Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing
[3] Tourism School, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai
来源
Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica | 2021年 / 76卷 / 02期
关键词
Adaptability; Agricultural-and-pastoral areas; Evolutionary mechanism; Rural human-land system;
D O I
10.11821/dlxb202102017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The theory on the cyclic adaptaion between society and ecosystem sheds new light on the evolution and internal structure of human-land system. This paper introduces the risk index (RI) and adaptation capacity index (ACI) to evaluate the rural human-land system, and sets up an evaluation index system for the adaptability of rural human-land system, under the effects of climate change and policy implementation. On this basis, the stages, features, control factors, and evolution mechanism were examined for the adaptability of rural human-land system in Darhan Mumingan United Banner from 1952 to 2017. The main results are as follows: (1) The evolution of the rural human-land system can be divided into three stages, namely, the reorganization and rapid development stage from 1952 to 2002 (population: +260%; cultivated land area: +13%; livestock: +134%; degradated grassland area: +16.33%), the rapid to stable development stage from 2003 to 2010 (population: +2.8%; cultivated land area: -2.3%; livestock: -13.6%; degradated grassland area: -10.7%), and the stable to release stage from 2011 to 2017 (population: -2.6%; cultivated land area: -0.2%; livestock: -10.6%; degradated grassland area: -3.8%). (2) With the elapse of time, the ACI of the rural human-land system went through a slow rise (-0.016-0.031), a slow decline (0.031-0.003), and a rapid rise (0.003-0.088). In terms of space, the adaptability is high in the middle, moderate in the north, and low in the south. (3) The adaptability evolution of the rural human-land system was mainly controlled by the per-capita effective irrigation area (22.31%) and the per-capita number of livestocks (23.47%) from 1990 to 2000, the desertification area of land (25.06%) and the land use intensity (21.27%) from 2000 to 2005, and the per-capita income of farmers and herdsmen (20.08%) and the per-capita number of livestocks (18.52%) from 2010 to 2007. (4) Under the effects of climate change and policy implementation, the cyclic adaptaion of the rural human-land system was propelled by the interactions between two kinds of subjects: farmers and herdsmen, and rural communities. The interaction affects the adaptive behavior of the two kinds of subjects, which in turn drives the cyclic evolution of the system. As a result, the system structure and functions developed alternatively between coordinated and uncoordinated states. Small-scale adaptive behaviors of farmers and herdsmen have a profound impact on the evolution of rural human-land system. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 502
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Fan Jie, Territorial system of human-environment interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern, Acta Geographica Sinica, 73, 4, pp. 597-607, (2018)
  • [2] Lu Dadao, Guo Laixi, Man-earth areal system: The core of geographical study: On the geographical thoughts and academic contributions of Academician Wu Chuanjun, Acta Geographica Sinica, 53, 2, pp. 97-105, (1998)
  • [3] Mao Hanying, Theories and methods of optimal control of human-earth system: Commemoration of 100th anniversary of Academician Wu Chuanjun's birth, Acta Geographica Sinica, 73, 4, pp. 608-619, (2018)
  • [4] Holling C S., Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems, Ecosystems, 4, 5, pp. 390-405, (2001)
  • [5] Gunderson L H, Holling C S., Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, (2002)
  • [6] Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R, Et al., Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, 9, 2, pp. 5-12, (2004)
  • [7] Walker B, Salt D., Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, (2006)
  • [8] Sun Jing, Wang Jun, Yang Xinjun, An overview on the resilience of social-ecological systems, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 12, pp. 5371-5381, (2007)
  • [9] Adger W N, Brooks N, Bentham G, Et al., New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, Tyndall Centre Technical Report, 7, pp. 10-11, (2004)
  • [10] Kiem A S, Austin E K., Drought and the future of rural communities: Opportunities and challenges for climate change adaptation in regional Victoria, Australia, Global Environmental Change, 23, 5, pp. 1307-1316, (2013)