An improved method for predicting CO2 minimum miscibility pressure based on artificial neural network

被引:4
作者
Dong P. [1 ]
Liao X. [1 ]
Chen Z. [1 ]
Chu H. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing
来源
Advances in Geo-Energy Research | 2019年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
Artificial neural network; CO[!sub]2[!/sub] minimum miscibility pressure; Dropout; L2; regularization; Multiple mixing cell methods;
D O I
10.26804/ager.2019.04.02
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method is widely used in actual oilfields. It is extremely important to accurately predict the CO2 minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for CO2-EOR. At present, many studies about MMP prediction are based on empirical, experimental, or numerical simulation methods, but these methods have limitations in accuracy or computation efficiency. Therefore, more work needs to be done. In this work, with the results of the slim-tube experiment and the data expansion of the multiple mixing cell methods, an improved artificial neural network (ANN) model that predicts CO2 MMP by the full composition of the crude oil and temperature is trained. To stabilize the neural network training process, L2 regularization and Dropout are used to address the issue of over-fitting in neural networks. Predicting results show that the ANN model with Dropout possesses higher prediction accuracy and stronger generalization ability. Then, based on the validation sample evaluation, the mean absolute percentage error and R-square of the ANN model are 6.99 and 0.948, respectively. Finally, the improved ANN model is tested by six samples obtained from slim-tube experiment results. The results indicate that the improved ANN model has extremely low time cost and high accuracy to predict CO2 MMP, which is of great significance for CO2-EOR. © The Author(s) 2019.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 364
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Ahmadi K., Johns R.T., Mogensen K., Et al., Limitations of current method-of-characteristics (MOC) methods using shock-jump approximations to predict MMPs for complex gas/oil displacements, SPE J, 16, 4, pp. 743-750, (2011)
  • [2] Ahmed T., A generalized methodology for minimum miscibility pressure, the Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Con-ference, (1997)
  • [3] Alston R.B., Kokolis G.P., James C.F., CO<sub>2</sub> minimum miscibility pressure: A correlation for impure CO<sub>2</sub> streams and live oil systems, SPE J, 25, 2, pp. 268-274, (1985)
  • [4] Choubineh A., Helalizadeh A., Wood D.A., Estimation of minimum miscibility pressure of varied gas compositions and reservoir crude oil over a wide range of conditions using an artificial neural network model, Adv. Geo-Energy Res, 3, 1, pp. 52-66, (2019)
  • [5] Chu H., Liao X., Chen Z., Et al., A new methodology to assess the maximum CO<sub>2</sub> geosequestration capacity of shale reservoirs with SRV based on wellbore pressure, Util, 34, pp. 239-255, (2019)
  • [6] Dehghani S.A.M., Sefti M.V., Ameri A., Et al., Minimum miscibility pressure prediction based on a hybrid neural genetic algorithm, Chem. Eng. Res. Des, 86, 2, pp. 173-185, (2008)
  • [7] Edalat M., Dinarvand N., Shariatpanahi S.F., Development of a new artificial neural network model for predicting minimum miscibility pressure in hydrocarbon gas injection, the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, (2007)
  • [8] Englezos P., Lee J.D., Gas hydrates: A cleaner source of energy and opportunity for innovative technologies, Korean J. Chem. Eng, 22, 5, pp. 671-681, (2005)
  • [9] Enick R.M., Holder G.D., Morsi B.I., A thermodynamic correlation for the minimum miscibility pressure in CO<sub>2</sub> flooding of petroleum reservoirs, Reserv. Eng, 3, 1, pp. 81-92, (1988)
  • [10] Glorot X., Bengio Y., Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res, 9, pp. 249-256, (2010)