The impact of paddy rice multiple cropping index changes in Southern China on national grain production capacity and its policy implications

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang M. [1 ,2 ]
Li X. [1 ,2 ]
Xin L. [1 ]
Tan M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
来源
Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica | 2019年 / 74卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Double-cropping rice to single-cropping rice; Food security; Policy implications; Rice multiple cropping index; Southern China;
D O I
10.11821/dlxb201901003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Changes of rice production in Southern China are crucial to national food security. This study employed Landsat images to map the distributions of paddy rice cropping systems in Southern China in 1990 and 2015, and then explored the impact of rice multiple cropping index changes on grain production capacity. The results indicated that: (1) From 1990 to 2015, the multiple cropping index of rice decreased from 148.3% to 129.3%, and the loss area due to conversion of double cropping rice to single cropping rice ("double to single") was 253. 16×104 hm2. The area with most dramatic changes was located in the Middle-Lower Yangtze Plain. The rice cropping systems in Southern China showed a change pattern of "double cropping rice shrinkage and single cropping rice expansion" from north to south. (2) From 1990 to 2015, "double to single" led to a reduction of 6.1% and 2.6% in rice production and grain production, respectively. Hunan and Jiangxi, located in the main rice producing areas, as well as Zhejiang with better economic development, had a large reduction in rice production due to "double to single", all exceeding 13%. (3) The grain production capacity of "double to single" paddy field is equivalent to that of 223.3×104 hm2 of newly reclaimed cultivated land. The equivalent newly reclaimed cultivated land is 54% of the total newly reclaimed cultivated land through the land consolidation project during 2001-2015, as well as 1.7 times the target of the newly cultivated land goal for the national land consolidation plan (2016-2020). Making full use of the "double to single" paddy field can save approximately 167.44 billion yuan newly reclaimed cultivated land costs. Therefore, instead of pursuing low-quality "new" arable land, it is better to make full use of the existing high-quality "old" arable land. The government should change the assessment method of cultivated land balance, and incorporate the sown area increased by improving multiple cropping index into the cultivated land compensation indicator. © 2019, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 43
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Schmidhuber J., Tubiello F.N., Global food security under climate change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 50, pp. 19703-19708, (2007)
  • [2] Huang J., Yang G., Understanding recent challenges and new food policy in China, Global Food Security, 12, pp. 119-126, (2017)
  • [3] Fu Z., Cai Y., Yang Y., Research on the relationship of cultivated land change and food security in China, Journal of Natural Resources, 16, 4, pp. 313-319, (2001)
  • [4] China Statistical Yearbook, (2017)
  • [5] Lichtenberg E., Ding C., Assessing farmland protection policy in China, Land Use Policy, 25, 1, pp. 59-68, (2008)
  • [6] Kong X.B., China must protect high-quality arable land, Nature, 506, 7486, (2014)
  • [7] Zhang K., Yu Z., Li X., Land use change and land degradation in China from 1991 to 2001, Land Degradation & Development, 18, 2, pp. 209-219, (2007)
  • [8] Liu X., Zhao C., Song W., Review of the evolution of cultivated land protection policies in the period following China's reform and liberalization, Land Use Policy, 67, pp. 660-669, (2017)
  • [9] Jin X., Zhang Z., Wu X., Co-ordination of land exploitation, exploitable farmland reserves and national planning in China, Land Use Policy, 57, pp. 682-693, (2016)
  • [10] Song W., Liu M., Farmland conversion decreases regional and national land quality in China, Land Degradation & Development, 28, 2, pp. 459-471, (2017)