Carbon footprint of municipal solid waste management in Guelph city, Ontario

被引:0
作者
Mohsen R.A. [1 ]
Abbassi B. [1 ]
Dutta A. [1 ]
Gordon D. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Engineering, University of Guelph
[2] Organic Waste Processing Facility, Guelph, ON
来源
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management | 2019年 / 45卷 / 04期
关键词
Circular economy; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life-cycle assessment; Material recovery facility; Municipal solid waste; Recycling;
D O I
10.5276/JSWTM/2019.441
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
More light is being shed continually on the environmental impacts of municipal solid waste due to the increasing amounts of waste generated and the related greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions from MSW account for 20% of Canadian greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and accordingly, waste legislation in Ontario demands high waste recovery and a moving towards a circular economy. This study evaluates the current municipal solid waste management in the City of Guelph and assesses possible alternative scenarios based on the associated GHG emissions. Waste Reduction Model (WARM) that was developed by the US-EPA has been used to quantify the GHG emissions produced over the entire life cycle of the MSW management scenario. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to investigate the influence of some scenarios on the overall GHG emissions. It has been found that one ton of landfilled waste generates approximately 0.39 ton of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2Eq). It was also found that the current solid waste scenario has a saving of 36086 million ton of CO2Eq (MCO2Eq). However, the results showed that the scenario with enhanced waste-to-energy, reduction at source and recycling has resulted in a high avoided emissions (0.74 kg CO2Eq/kg MSW). The anaerobic Digestion scenario caused the lowest avoided emissions of 0.39 kg CO2Eq/kg MSW. The net avoided emissions for reduction at source scenario were found to be the same as that found by the current scenario (0.4 kg CO2Eq/kg MSW). The sensitivity analysis of both reduction at source and recycling rates show a linear inverse proportional relationship with total GHG emissions reduction. © 2019 Widener University School of Civil Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 449
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Baere L., Mattheeuws B., Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Europe -Status, experience and prospects, Waste Management, Recycling and Recovery, 3, pp. 517-526, (2012)
[2]  
Cave S., Recycling in Germany, (2017)
[3]  
Cherubini F., Bargigli S., Ulgiati S., Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration, Energy, 34, 12, pp. 2116-2123, (2009)
[4]  
Christensen T.H., Bhander G., Lindvall H., Larsen A.W., Fruergaard T., Damgaard A., Manfredi S., Boldrin A., Riber C., Hauschild M., Experience with the use of LCA-modelling (EASE- WASTE) in waste management, Waste Management & Research, 25, pp. 257-262, (2007)
[5]  
"City of Guelph Annual Report: Solid Waste Resource Innovation Centre.", (2016)
[6]  
D'Avignon A., Azevedo F., Lebre E., Burle C., Emission inventory: an urban policy instrument and benchmark, Energy Policy, 38, 9, pp. 4838-4847, (2010)
[7]  
Dewey J., Denslow D., Chavez B., Romero H., Holt L., Analysis of a Florida Beverage Container Deposit Refund System, (2011)
[8]  
Emilia S.M., Luizm A.K., Life Cycle Assessment: Management tools for Decision Making, Senac University, A Journal on integrated Management of Occupational Health and the Environment, 1, 1, pp. 1-8, (2006)
[9]  
"Documentation for Greenhouse Gas Emission and Energy Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) (WARM V. 13), (2018)
[10]  
Eriksson O., Bisaillon M., Multiple system modelling of waste management, Waste Management, 31, pp. 2620-2630, (2011)