Towards Immersive Collaborative Sensemaking

被引:11
作者
Yang Y. [1 ]
Dwyer T. [1 ]
Wybrow M. [1 ]
Lee B. [1 ]
Cordeil M. [2 ]
Billinghurst M. [3 ]
Thomas B.H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, VIC
[2] The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, QLD
[3] University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd, Adelaide, 5095, SA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Collaborative Sensemaking; Virtual Reality;
D O I
10.1145/3567741
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When collaborating face-to-face, people commonly use the surfaces and spaces around them to perform sensemaking tasks, such as spatially organising documents, notes or images. However, when people collaborate remotely using desktop interfaces they no longer feel like they are sharing the same space. This limitation may be overcome through collaboration in immersive environments, which simulate the physical in-person experience. In this paper, we report on a between-groups study comparing collaborations on image organisation tasks, in an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) environment to more conventional desktop conferencing. Collecting data from 40 subjects in groups of four, we measured task performance, user behaviours, collaboration engagement and awareness. Overall, the VR and desktop interface resulted in similar speed, accuracy and social presence rating, but we observed more conversations and interaction with objects, and more equal contributions to the interaction from participants within groups in VR. We also identified differences in coordination and collaborative awareness behaviours between VR and desktop platforms. We report on a set of systematic measures for assessing VR collaborative experience and a new analysis tool that we have developed to capture user behaviours in collaborative setting. Finally, we provide design considerations and directions for future work. © 2022 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Andrews C., Endert A., North C., Space to Think: Large High-Resolution Displays for Sensemaking, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 55-64, (2010)
[2]  
Baker K., Greenberg S., Gutwin C., Empirical Development of a Heuristic Evaluation Methodology for Shared Workspace Groupware, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative work, pp. 96-105, (2002)
[3]  
Barsalou L.W., Ad hoc categories, Memory & Cognition, 11, 3, pp. 211-227, (1983)
[4]  
Batch A., Cunningham A., Cordeil M., Elmqvist N., Dwyer T., Thomas B.H., Marriott K., There Is No Spoon: Evaluating Performance, Space Use, and Presence with Expert Domain Users in Immersive Analytics, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26, 1, pp. 536-546, (2019)
[5]  
Bente G., Ruggenberg S., Kramer N.C., Eschenburg F., Avatar-Mediated Networking: Increasing Social Presence and Interpersonal Trust in Net-Based Collaborations, Human Communication Research, 34, 2, pp. 287-318, (2008)
[6]  
Billinghurst M., Belcher D., Gupta A., Kiyokawa K., Communication Behaviors in Colocated Collaborative AR Interfaces, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 3, pp. 395-423, (2003)
[7]  
Billinghurst M., Cordeil M., Bezerianos A., Margolis T., Collaborative immersive analytics, Immersive Analytics, pp. 221-257, (2018)
[8]  
Biocca F., Harms C., Burgoon J.K., Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Reviewand Suggested Criteria, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 5, pp. 456-480, (2003)
[9]  
Bradel L., Endert A., Koch K., Andrews C., North C., Large high resolution displays for co-located collaborative sensemaking: Display usage and territoriality, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71, 11, pp. 1078-1088, (2013)
[10]  
Bulu S.T., Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds, Computers and Education, 58, 1, pp. 154-161, (2012)