Purchase behavior of structured products based on tri-reference point theory

被引:0
作者
Wang Z.-R. [1 ]
He T.-T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Business School, Central South University, Changsha
来源
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2020年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
Investment decision; Investor preference; Portfolio selection; Safety-first principle; Structured products; Tri-reference point theory;
D O I
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2018.0558
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In tri-reference point theory, minimum requirement (MR), status quo (SQ), and goal (G) are behavior rules for decision-making subjects, which divide the value into four regions: failure, loss, gain and success. Taking into account the investors' three reference points of investment return, a portfolio selection model is constructed by setting the maximum investors' perceived value in tri-reference point theory as the objective under the premise of meeting the safety-first principle. A particle swarm algorithm that is suitable for solving this optimization problem is designed. On this basis, two types of common structured products in China's financial market are included in two portfolios. Then the purchase behavior of structured products and the superiority of structured products compared to risk-free assets and underlying assets are studied by changing the parameters in tri-reference point theory. The results show that structured products are most favored by investors when both MR and G are relatively high. This is because under these circumstances, structured products can meet the demand of investors to pursue relatively high return on the premise of ensuring safety to make most investors prefer them. © 2020, Editorial Office of Control and Decision. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 685
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Entrop O., McKenzie M., Wilkens M., The performance of individual investors in structured financial products, Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 46, 3, pp. 569-604, (2016)
  • [2] Kiriakopoulos K., Mavralexakis T., Structured bonds and greek demons-is the attack"fair, J of Applied Finance & Banking, 1, 2, pp. 231-277, (2011)
  • [3] Rieger M.O., Hens T., Explaining the demand for structured financial products: Survey and field experiment evidence, Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaft, 82, 5, pp. 491-508, (2012)
  • [4] Abreu M., Mendes V., The investor in structured retail products: Advice driven or gambling oriented, J of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, pp. 1-9, (2018)
  • [5] Rieger M.O., Why do investors buy bad financial products? Probability misestimation and preferences in financial investment decision, J of Behavioral Finance, 13, 2, pp. 108-118, (2012)
  • [6] Hens T., Rieger M.O., Can utility optimization explain the demand for structured investment products?, Quantitative Finance, 14, 4, pp. 673-681, (2014)
  • [7] Hens T., Rieger M.O., The dark side of the moon: structured products from the customer's perspective, (2008)
  • [8] Dobeli B., Vanini P., Stated and revealed investment decisions concerning retail structured products, J of Banking & Finance, 34, 6, pp. 1400-1411, (2010)
  • [9] Vandenbroucke J., A cumulative prospect view on portfolios that hold structured products, J of Behavioral Finance, 16, 4, pp. 297-310, (2015)
  • [10] Ren M., Chen J.L., A Study on pricing of foreign exchange financial products with guaranteed equity-linked structure, Studies of International Finance, 12, pp. 64-70, (2008)