Research on efficiency of regional tourism resources allocation based on DEA model

被引：0
作者：
Li S.-D. [1 ]
Li S.-X. [2 ]
Zhong Y.-D. [1 ]
Ren T. [2 ]
Xiao H.-L. [3 ]
Jia B.-B. [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Tourism, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha
[2] School of Logistics and Transportation, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha
[3] School of Business, Hunan Normal University, Changsha
来源：
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2022年 / 37卷 / 08期
关键词：
data envelopment analysis; efficiency evaluation; optimal allocation of resources; tourism;
D O I：
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.0575
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
It is of great significance to explore the efficiency of China’s tourism resource allocation for optimizing the allocation of tourism resources and promoting the sustainable development of tourism. By constructing the input-output index system considering carbon emissions, this paper uses the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to evaluate and analyze the efficiency of tourism resource allocation in 30 provinces and cities in China, and then uses the Tobit model to explore the influencing factors of tourism resource allocation efficiency in the whole country, east, central and western regions. The results show that the efficiency of resource allocation is generally invalid in the tourism industry of provinces and cities in China, and the overall efficiency is “the highest in the west, the second in the east, and the lowest in the middle”. Among them, the low economic and social efficiency of tourism industry is the main reason for the low efficiency of tourism resource allocation. Among many factors, environmental regulation has the greatest impact on the efficiency of tourism resource allocation. © 2022 Northeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1945 / 1954
页数：9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Dogru T, Bulut U, Kocak E, Et al., The nexus between tourism, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions: Contemporary evidence from OECD countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27, 32, pp. 40930-40948, (2020)
  • [2] Jia Z Y, Gao M Y, Xu S J, Et al., Sociocultural vitality versus regulation policy and tourism development in preservation of traditional rural landscape: A case from Guizhou, China, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28, 2, pp. 179-192, (2021)
  • [3] Ren T, Li S X, Zhou Z B, Et al., Study on efciency evaluation of regional sustainable development system based on BLP-DEA and satisfaction degree, Chinese Journal of Management Science
  • [4] Paiano A, Crovella T, Lagioia G., Managing sustainable practices in cruise tourism: The assessment of carbon footprint and waste of water and beverage packaging, Tourism Management, 77, (2020)
  • [5] Ye XL., Studyontheecologicalefficiencyanditstemporal dynamic evolution of China’s cruise tourism from the perspective of carbon footprint, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17, 6, pp. 13001-13013, (2019)
  • [6] Luo F, Moyle B D, Moyle C L J, Et al., Drivers of carbon emissions in China’s tourism industry, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28, 5, pp. 747-770, (2020)
  • [7] Wang L, Wang J J, Wu C G., Advances in green shop scheduling and optimization, Control and Decision, 33, 3, pp. 385-391, (2018)
  • [8] Tao S, Sheng Z H, Xu F., Integrated optimization of project scheduling and multi-scale resource allocation problem, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 32, 1, pp. 204-211, (2018)
  • [9] Joun H J, Kim H., Productivity evaluation of tourism and culture for sustainable economic development: Analyzing south Korea’s metropolitan regions, Sustainability, 12, 7, (2020)
  • [10] Ren T, Li S X, Xu H B, Et al., Research on the efficiency evaluation and improvement countermeasures of regional eco-economic system from the perspective of ecological priority, Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology: Social Sciences, 14, 3, pp. 29-37, (2020)
123