Lignocellulosic bioethanol production from grasses pre-treated with acid mine drainage: Modeling and comparison of SHF and SSF

被引：0

作者：

Burman N.W. ^{[1
]}

Sheridan C.M. ^{[1
]}

Harding K.G. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Industrial and Mining Water Research Unit (IMWaRU), Centre in Water Research and Development (CiWaRD), School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits, Johannesburg

来源：

Bioresource Technology Reports | 2019年 / 7卷

关键词：

Dilute acid pre-treatment; lignocellulosic bioethanol; Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF); Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF);

D O I：

10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100299

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Acid mine drainage (AMD) was used for the pre-treatment of indigenous South African grass (Eragrostis curvula), and compared to H2SO4 (1 wt%) pre-treatment. The optimal pre-treatment duration were investigated and found to be 1 day for H2SO4 and 3 days for AMD pre-treatment. The optimal biomass solid loadings were found to be 20 wt% for both pre-treatment methods. Additionally, enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation to produce ethanol were investigated for both separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). In both SHF and SSF, the H2SO4 pre-treatment obtained higher concentrations of glucose/ethanol compared to AMD pre-treatment. The concentration of glucose/ethanol obtained using AMD pre-treatment was 70–80% of that achieved using H2SO4 pre-treatment. Empirical equations modeling the glucose/ethanol concentration in all processes were determined using a least squares method. Concentrations predicted by the models were found to have a high correlation (r2 = 0.87–0.99) to concentrations determined experimentally. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

引用

共 39 条

[1]

Alvira P., Tomas-Pejo E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J., Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 101, pp. 4851-4861, (2010)

[2]

Ayoub M.-J., Legras J.-L., Saliba R., Gaillardin C., Application of multi locus sequence typing to the analysis of the biodiversity of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts from Lebanon, J. Appl. Microbiol., 100, pp. 699-711, (2006)

[3]

Bansal P., Hall M., Realff M.J., Lee J.H., Bommarius A.S., Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates, Biotechnol. Adv., 27, pp. 833-848, (2009)

[4]

Burman N.W., van Dyk L., Postma F., Sheridan C., Simate G.S., HArding K.G., Flow Sheet and Sensitivity analyses for the bio-remediation of acid mine drainage using sulfate reducing bacteria and South African grasses, 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environment and Climate Change (ICEECC). Pointe Aux Piments, Mauritius, (2017)

[5]

Burman N.W., Harding K.G., Sheridan C.M., Van Dyk L., Evaluation of a combined lignocellulosic/waste water bio-refinery for the simultaneous production of valuable biochemical products and the remediation of acid mine drainage, Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin., 12, pp. 649-664, (2018)

[6]

Burman N.W., Sheridan C., van Dyk L., Harding K.G., Modelling of low temperature dilute sulfuric acid pre-treatment of South African grass, Bioresour. Technol. Reports, 4, pp. 21-28, (2018)

[7]

Dowe N., Mcmillan J.D., SSF Experimental Protocols — Lignocellulosic Biomass Hydrolysis and Fermentation Laboratory Analytical Procedure, (2008)

[8]

E4TECH, RE-CORD, WUR, From the sugar platform to biofuels and biochemicals, Final Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Energy, (2015)

[9]

Humbird D., Davis R., Tao L., Kinchin C., Hsu D., Aden A., Schoen P., Lukas J., Olthof B., Worley M., Sexton D., Dudgeon D., Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol, (2011)

[10]

IPCC, Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report, (2014)

← 1 2 3 4 →