Impact of Flattening Filter Free Photon Beam on Rapidarc Radiotherapy for Gynaecological Malignancies: A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar L. [1 ,2 ]
Kishore V. [3 ]
Bhushan M. [2 ]
Yadav G. [2 ]
Dewan A. [2 ]
Kumar P. [2 ]
Kumar G. [2 ]
Chowdhary R.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Applied Science and Humanities, Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow
[2] Medical Physics Division and Radiation Oncology Department, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi
[3] Department of Applied Science and Humanities, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jhansi
来源
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics | 2021年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Gynecology; Photon Energy; Radiotherapy; Treatment Planning;
D O I
10.22038/ijmp.2019.35081.1650
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: To compare the dosimetric outcomes of 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free beam (FFFB) energies in gynaecological malignancies RapidArc (RA) planning. Material and Methods: The RA plans were generated for a cohort of 20 patients using 6 and 10 MV FFFBs. The plans aimed to deliver a dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions to planning target volume (PTV); moreover, planning objectives were kept as low as reasonably achievable for organs at risk (OARs). Dosimetric analysis was performed in terms of PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose to OAR’s, integral dose to normal tissue (NTID), and total number of monitor units (MU’s). Results: According to the results, volumes of PTV receiving prescription dose and CI values were 95.03±0.10% and 95.02±0.18%, as well as 1.018±0.028 and 1.024±0.027, respectively. Moreover, HI values were estimated at 1.063±0.008 and 1.068±0.010. Additionally, the corresponding values of mean NTID and MUs were 280.3±42.5 and 267.9±39.1 (liter-Gy), as well as 610.3±30.3 and 630.6±39.7 for FFFB using 6 and 10 MV, respectively. The 6 and 10 MV FFFBs were statistically similar in terms of mean dose to bladder, rectum and both femoral heads, while comparison yielded significant difference (P<0.05) in terms of HI, CI, MUs and NTID. Conclusion: The FFFB of 6MV was found superior, compared to 10MV, for RA planning in case of gynaecological malignancies. Moreover, it offers better HI and CI values, as well as fewer numbers of MUs (3.33%). In addition, it delivers more NTID (4.42%) for similar target coverage and OAR’s sparing. © 2020. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies - A Planning Study
    Bell, Katharina
    Fleckenstein, Jochen
    Nuesken, Frank
    Licht, Norbert
    Ruebe, Christian
    Dzierma, Yvonne
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [22] Beam properties and stability of a flattening-filter free 7 MV beam-An overview
    Dzierma, Yvonne
    Licht, Norbert
    Nuesken, Frank
    Ruebe, Christian
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2595 - 2602
  • [23] Small field characterization of a Nanochamber prototype under flattening filter free photon beams
    Reggiori, G.
    Stravato, A.
    Mancosu, P.
    Lobefalo, F.
    Paganini, L.
    Zucconi, F.
    Palumbo, V
    Gaudino, A.
    Scorsetti, M.
    Tomatis, S.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 49 : 139 - 146
  • [24] Impact of Dosimetric Parameters on Interplay Effects in 6 MV Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams to Treat Lung Cancer
    Poolnapol, Vanida
    Sanghangthum, Taweap
    Keawsamur, Mintra
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 47 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [25] Evaluation of Flattening Filter-Free RapidArc and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Techniques for Postoperative Cervical Cancer Treatment
    Manna, Sumanta
    Singh, Sharad
    Gupta, Pramod Kumar
    Ragul, T.
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 39 (03): : 294 - 306
  • [26] Measurements of photon beam flattening filter using an anisotropic analytical algorithm and electron beam employing electron Monte Carlo
    Krabch M.A.
    Chetaine A.
    Saidi K.
    Erradi F.Z.
    Nourreddine A.
    Benkhouya Y.
    El Baydaoui R.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2019, 16 (03): : 200 - 209
  • [27] Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy
    Fogliata, A.
    Garcia, R.
    Knoos, T.
    Nicolini, G.
    Clivio, A.
    Vanetti, E.
    Khamphan, C.
    Cozzi, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) : 6455 - 6464
  • [28] Plan quality and delivery accuracy of flattening filter free beam for SBRT lung treatments
    Hansen, Christian Ronn
    Bertelsen, Anders
    Riis, Hans Lynggaard
    Christiansen, Rasmus Lubeck
    Hansen, Olfred
    Sykes, Jonathan B.
    Thwaites, David Ian
    Brink, Carsten
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (03) : 422 - 427
  • [29] Comparison between flattening filter and flattening filter-free photon beams in head and neck cancer patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy technique
    Alfishawy, Mahmoud Mohamed
    Elshahat, Khaled Mohamed
    Kany, Amr Ismail
    RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2025, : 67 - 76
  • [30] Comparison of skin dose of flattening filter and flattening filter-free beam in volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for head and neck cancer
    Lam Pham Hong
    Dung Phan Tien
    Thai Hoang Huu
    Lam Nguyen Tung
    Tu Nguyen Duong
    Van Anh Nguyen Thi
    Trang Pham Quang
    2023 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ICHST 2023, 2023,