Impact of Flattening Filter Free Photon Beam on Rapidarc Radiotherapy for Gynaecological Malignancies: A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar L. [1 ,2 ]
Kishore V. [3 ]
Bhushan M. [2 ]
Yadav G. [2 ]
Dewan A. [2 ]
Kumar P. [2 ]
Kumar G. [2 ]
Chowdhary R.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Applied Science and Humanities, Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow
[2] Medical Physics Division and Radiation Oncology Department, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi
[3] Department of Applied Science and Humanities, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jhansi
来源
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics | 2021年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Gynecology; Photon Energy; Radiotherapy; Treatment Planning;
D O I
10.22038/ijmp.2019.35081.1650
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: To compare the dosimetric outcomes of 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free beam (FFFB) energies in gynaecological malignancies RapidArc (RA) planning. Material and Methods: The RA plans were generated for a cohort of 20 patients using 6 and 10 MV FFFBs. The plans aimed to deliver a dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions to planning target volume (PTV); moreover, planning objectives were kept as low as reasonably achievable for organs at risk (OARs). Dosimetric analysis was performed in terms of PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose to OAR’s, integral dose to normal tissue (NTID), and total number of monitor units (MU’s). Results: According to the results, volumes of PTV receiving prescription dose and CI values were 95.03±0.10% and 95.02±0.18%, as well as 1.018±0.028 and 1.024±0.027, respectively. Moreover, HI values were estimated at 1.063±0.008 and 1.068±0.010. Additionally, the corresponding values of mean NTID and MUs were 280.3±42.5 and 267.9±39.1 (liter-Gy), as well as 610.3±30.3 and 630.6±39.7 for FFFB using 6 and 10 MV, respectively. The 6 and 10 MV FFFBs were statistically similar in terms of mean dose to bladder, rectum and both femoral heads, while comparison yielded significant difference (P<0.05) in terms of HI, CI, MUs and NTID. Conclusion: The FFFB of 6MV was found superior, compared to 10MV, for RA planning in case of gynaecological malignancies. Moreover, it offers better HI and CI values, as well as fewer numbers of MUs (3.33%). In addition, it delivers more NTID (4.42%) for similar target coverage and OAR’s sparing. © 2020. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study between flattening filter-free beams and flattening filter beams in radiotherapy treatment
    Ali Wagdy
    Khaled EI Shahat
    Huda Ashry
    Amaal El Shershaby
    Ehab Abdo
    OncologyandTranslationalMedicine, 2017, 3 (06) : 260 - 266
  • [2] Evaluation of radiation treatment plan quality in head and neck cancer: a comparative analysis of RapidArc technique with flattening filter and flattening filter-free photon beams
    Mishra, Atul
    Manna, Sumanta
    Mittal, Kailash Kumar
    Singh, Sharad
    Yadav, Neha
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2025, 19
  • [3] Radiobiological analysis of VMAT treatment plan with flattened and flattening filter free photon beam: an EUD and TCP based comparative study
    Saroj, Dinesh Kumar
    Yadav, Suresh
    Paliwal, Neetu
    Haldar, Subhash
    Shende, Ravindra B.
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Yogi, Veenita
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2024, 29 (01) : 77 - 89
  • [4] Dosimetric and Radiobiological Impact of Flattening Filter-Free Beam and Dose Calculation Algorithm Using RapidArc Plans for Cervical Cancer Treatment
    Manna, Sumanta
    Singh, Sharad
    Gupta, Pramod Kumar
    Ragul, T.
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 7 (03): : 197 - 206
  • [5] The dosimetric impact of different photon beam energy on RapidArc radiotherapy planning for cervix carcinoma
    Kumar, Lalit
    Yadav, Girigesh
    Raman, Kothanda
    Bhushan, Manindra
    Pal, Manoj
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 40 (04) : 207 - 213
  • [6] Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study
    Abacioglu, Ufuk
    Ozen, Zeynep
    Yilmaz, Meltem
    Arifoglu, Alptekin
    Gunhan, Basri
    Kayalilar, Namik
    Peker, Selcuk
    Sengoz, Meric
    Gurdalli, Salih
    Cozzi, Luca
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [7] Monte Carlo study of a free flattening filter to increase surface dose on 12 MV photon beam
    Zeghari, A.
    Saaidi, R.
    El Moursli, R. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (02): : 307 - 313
  • [8] Melatonin as a radioprotective agent against flattening filter and flattening filter-free beam in radiotherapy-induced lung tissue damage
    Ozer Simsek, Zuhal
    Aras, Serhat
    Cikrikcioglu, Makbule
    Baydili, Kursad Nuri
    Cortuk, Mustafa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2025, 101 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [9] Monte Carlo study of a flattening filter-free 6 MV photon beam using the BEAMnrc code.
    Kajaria, Ankit
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Sharma, Shiru
    Pradhan, Satyajit
    Mandal, Abhijit
    Aggarwal M, Lalit
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (04): : 1566 - 1573
  • [10] Chest wall radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arcs and the potential role of flattening filter free photon beams
    Subramaniam, S.
    Thirumalaiswamy, S.
    Srinivas, C.
    Gandhi, G. A.
    Kathirvel, M.
    Kumar, K. K.
    Mallik, S.
    Babaiah, M.
    Pawar, Y.
    Clivio, A.
    Fogliata, A.
    Mancosu, P.
    Nicolini, G.
    Vanetti, E.
    Cozzi, L.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (06) : 484 - 490