Selection of optimal assembly strategy at an engine assembly plant using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making tools

被引:0
作者
Pattanaik L.N. [1 ]
Jena A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Production Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi
关键词
Assembly strategy; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Fuzzy-VIKOR; MCDM; Multi-criteria decision making; RASs; Reconfigurable assembly systems;
D O I
10.1504/IJISE.2020.110244
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper is presenting a methodology to select an optimal assembly strategy using two fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tools as illustrated in a case study of an engine assembly plant. Based on an automotive engine assembly system, the existing challenges and related criteria are identified. Four potential assembly strategies compatible with existing system are developed to address the challenges. Two different fuzzy MCDM tools (VIKOR and TOPSIS) are applied for the multi-criteria problem to select the optimal assembly strategy. Four decision makers (DMs) from middle-level management are involved during the process. A comparison of results from the two MCDM tools is performed to consolidate the decision. For the present case, reconfigurable assembly system (RAS) is found to be the most preferred assembly strategy by both the MCDM tools. The ranking for rest of the alternatives are also found. Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 299
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Assessment of Vaccination Strategies Using Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making [J].
Lopez, Daphne ;
Gunasekaran, M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY AND NEURO COMPUTING (FANCCO - 2015), 2015, 415 :195-208
[42]   Supplier selection for vendor-managed inventory in healthcare using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach [J].
Sumrit, Detcharat .
DECISION SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 9 (02) :233-256
[43]   A Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Facility Location Selection Using PROMETHEE Under a Fuzzy Environment [J].
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza ;
Sotoudeh-Anvari, Alireza ;
Siadat, Ali .
OUTLOOKS AND INSIGHTS ON GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, GDN 2015, 2015, 218 :145-156
[44]   A New Extension to a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment [J].
Phochanikorn, Patchara ;
Tan, Chunqiao .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
[45]   Service Selection Using Multi-criteria Decision Making: A Comprehensive Overview [J].
Mehdi Hosseinzadeh ;
Hawkar Kamaran Hama ;
Marwan Yassin Ghafour ;
Mohammad Masdari ;
Omed Hassan Ahmed ;
Hemn Khezri .
Journal of Network and Systems Management, 2020, 28 :1639-1693
[46]   Service Selection Using Multi-criteria Decision Making: A Comprehensive Overview [J].
Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi ;
Hama, Hawkar Kamaran ;
Ghafour, Marwan Yassin ;
Masdari, Mohammad ;
Ahmed, Omed Hassan ;
Khezri, Hemn .
JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (04) :1639-1693
[47]   Optimal location selection of a casual-dining restaurant using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach [J].
Alwedyan, Safaa .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 12 (01) :156-172
[48]   Multi-criteria decision-making using a complete ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [J].
Marimuthu, Dharmalingam ;
Mahapatra, G. S. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (15) :9859-9871
[49]   Complex power-to-gas plant site selection by multi-criteria decision-making and GIS [J].
Soha, Tamas ;
Hartmann, Balint .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2022, 13
[50]   Multi-criteria decision-making using a complete ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [J].
Dharmalingam Marimuthu ;
G. S. Mahapatra .
Soft Computing, 2021, 25 :9859-9871