Selection of optimal assembly strategy at an engine assembly plant using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making tools

被引:0
作者
Pattanaik L.N. [1 ]
Jena A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Production Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi
关键词
Assembly strategy; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Fuzzy-VIKOR; MCDM; Multi-criteria decision making; RASs; Reconfigurable assembly systems;
D O I
10.1504/IJISE.2020.110244
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper is presenting a methodology to select an optimal assembly strategy using two fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tools as illustrated in a case study of an engine assembly plant. Based on an automotive engine assembly system, the existing challenges and related criteria are identified. Four potential assembly strategies compatible with existing system are developed to address the challenges. Two different fuzzy MCDM tools (VIKOR and TOPSIS) are applied for the multi-criteria problem to select the optimal assembly strategy. Four decision makers (DMs) from middle-level management are involved during the process. A comparison of results from the two MCDM tools is performed to consolidate the decision. For the present case, reconfigurable assembly system (RAS) is found to be the most preferred assembly strategy by both the MCDM tools. The ranking for rest of the alternatives are also found. Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 299
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHOD FOR DAM SELECTION [J].
Tzimopoulos, C. ;
Balioti, V. ;
Evangelides, C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013,
[22]   Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review [J].
Masdari, Mohammad ;
Khezri, Hemn .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 12 (02) :2803-2834
[23]   Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach [J].
Yadav, Vinod ;
Sharma, Milind Kumar .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (06) :1158-1174
[24]   Service selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive review [J].
Mohammad Masdari ;
Hemn Khezri .
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2021, 12 :2803-2834
[25]   Optimal site selection for wind power plant using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study in eastern Iran [J].
Alavi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed ;
Maleki, Akbar ;
Khaleghi, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 17 :1319-1337
[26]   Charging strategy selection for electric bus systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach [J].
Sadrani, Mohammad ;
Najafi, Amirhossein ;
Mirqasemi, Razieh ;
Antoniou, Constantinos .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 347
[27]   An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Industrial Robot Selection [J].
Tran, Ngoc-Tien ;
Trinh, Van-Long ;
Chung, Chen-Kuei .
PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (08)
[28]   Fighter optimal selection based on sequential multi-criteria decision-making with uncertainty measurement [J].
Suo, M. ;
Xing, J. ;
Ma, K. ;
Xiao, D. ;
Song, D. .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2025,
[29]   Extending the WEDBA to the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making environment [J].
Al-Hawari, Tarek ;
Naji, Ahmed ;
Alshraideh, Hussam ;
Bataineh, Omar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 59 (04) :330-346
[30]   A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection [J].
Amir Khanlari ;
Mohammad Alhuyi Nazari .
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2022, 147 :4473-4489