Numerical Simulation on Shock Wave Propagation Characteristics in Centrifugal Tests of Underwater Explosion with Energy Absorbing Boundaries

被引:0
|
作者
Li M. [1 ]
Zhang Q.-L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li Z. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Engineering Safety and Disaster Prevention, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan
[2] Research Center on National Dam Safety Engineering Technology, Wuhan
[3] Research Center on Water Engineering Safety and Disaster Prevention, the Ministry of Water Resources, Wuhan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
boundary effect; centrifugal model test; numerical simulation; underwater explosion; wave absorption and energy dissipation;
D O I
10.11943/CJEM2023125
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Limited by the size of model test chamber,the reflection wave generated by explosion load on the boundary of test chamber would inevitably affect the expected results in the centrifugal tests of underwater explosion. Therefore,reducing the boundary effect will substantially restore the actual test situation and improve the test accuracy. Numerical simulation on centrifuge model test of underwater explosion was conducted based on the Coupled‐Eulerian‐Lagrangian(CEL)method. Through comparing experimental results with theoretical results and analyzing mesh sizes of 1,2,4,6,8 and 10 mm,the reliability of the numerical model was verified. Based on that,the shock wave propagation characteristics in centrifuge tests of underwater explosion with boundary energy absorbing materials of rubber and foam(thicknesses of 5,10,15 and 20 mm)were compared,and the mechanism of wave absorption and energy dissipation was analyzed. The results show that the Euler mesh size of 2 mm could balance the calculation efficiency and accuracy of calculation results. Laying rubber or foam materials on the inner wall of the model chamber could effectively reduce the reflection effect of underwater explosion shock waves. The rubber material is more effective in shock wave absorption than the foam material for the condition of 5 mm thickness. However,with the increase of material thickness,the foam material has a better absorption effect than rubber. Both rubber and foam materials have a certain inhibitory effect on low‐frequency signals of shock waves,but the inhibitory effect on high‐frequency signals is weak. © 2023 Institute of Chemical Materials, China Academy of Engineering Physics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 831
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Qi LI, WANG Gao-hui, Et al., A rapid identification method for underwater explosion damage of a concrete gravity dam[J], Journal of Vibration and Shock, 39, 24, pp. 46-53, (2020)
  • [2] ZHANG Ai-feng, Miao YAO, ZHEN Chun-bo, Research on impact resistance of improved V‐type sandwich panels in near‐field underwater explosion[J], Ship Science and Technol‑ ogy, 43, 7, pp. 13-17, (2021)
  • [3] LOHNER R,, Study of underwater explosion near rigid cylinder column with numerical method[J], Ocean Engineering, 270, 2023
  • [4] ZHANG A M, CUI P., A unified theory for bubble dynamics[J], Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35, pp. 1-28, (2023)
  • [5] WANG Q S, LOU H., Calibration of numerical simulation methods for underwater explosion with centrifugal tests [J], Shock and Vibration, 2019, 8, pp. 1-19, (2019)
  • [6] ZHAO Yu-hong, YAN Qiu-shi, Dynamic response and damage destruction of structures underunderwater explosion loads[J], Engineering Blasting, 28, (2022)
  • [7] ZHANG X,, Et al., Effect of bubble pulse on concrete gravity dam subjected to underwater explosion:Centrifuge test and numerical simulation[J], Ocean Engineering, (2022)
  • [8] MA Shang, CHEN Ye-qing, WANG Zhen-qing, Et al., Study on load scaling relationship in centrifuge test of underwater explosion[J], China Civil Engineering Journal, 54, 10, pp. 20-29, (2021)
  • [9] WANG Si, HU Jing, ZHANG Xue-dong, Et al., Numerical analysis and centrifugal test of underwater explosion effect at different water depths[J], Journal of Harbin Institute of Tech‑ nology, 52, 6, pp. 78-84, (2020)
  • [10] ZHANG H, YIN Z G,, CHEN M., Experiment on bubble characteristics of turbulent bubbly jets in pipe crossflow[J], Ocean Engineering, 271, 2023