A Longitudinal Goal Setting Model for Addressing Complex Personal Problems in Mental Health

被引：10
作者：
Agapie E. [1 ]
Areán P.A. [2 ]
Hsieh G. [2 ]
Munson S.A. [2 ]
机构：
[1] University of California, Irvine, CA
[2] University of Washington, Seattle, WA
来源：
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | 2022年 / 6卷 / CSCW2期
关键词：
collaborative reflection; goal setting; mental health;
D O I：
10.1145/3555160
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Goal setting is critical to achieving desired changes in life. Many technologies support defining and tracking progress toward goals, but these are just some parts of the process of setting and achieving goals. People want to set goals that are more complex than the ones supported through technology. Additionally, people use goal-setting technologies longitudinally, yet the understanding of how people's goals evolve is still limited. We study the collaborative practices of mental health therapists and clients for longitudinally setting and working toward goals through semi-structured interviews with 11 clients and 7 therapists who practiced goal setting in their therapy sessions. Based on the results, we create the Longitudinal Goal Setting Model in mental health, a three-stage model. The model describes how clients and therapists select among multiple complex problems, simplify complex problems to specific goals, and adjust goals to help people address complex issues. Our findings show collaboration between clients and therapists can support transformative reflection practices that are difficult to achieve without the therapist, such as seeing problems through new perspectives, questioning and changing practices, or addressing avoided issues. © 2022 Owner/Author.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [11] Eric P.S., Baumer, Reflective informatics: Conceptual dimensions for designing technologies of reflection, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 585-594, (2015)
  • [12] Bentvelzen M., Niess J., Wozniak P.W., The Technology-Mediated Reflection Model: Barriers and Assistance in Data-Driven Reflection, Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-12, (2021)
  • [13] Bhattacharya A., Kolovson S., Sung Y., Eacker M., Chen M., Munson S.A., Kientz J.A., 2018. Understanding pivotal experiences in behavior change for the design of technologies for personal wellbeing, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 79, pp. 129-142, (2018)
  • [14] Burgess E.R., Ringland K.E., Nicholas J., Knapp A.A., Eschler J., Mohr D.C., Reddy M.C., 2019 i think people are powerful the Sociality of Individuals Managing Depression, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW, pp. 1-29, (2019)
  • [15] Burgess E.R., Zhang R., Kiranmai Ernala S., Feuston J.L., De Choudhury M., Czerwinski M., Aguilera A., Schueller S.M., Reddy M.C., 2020 Technology ecosystems: Rethinking resources for mental health, Interactions, 28, 1, pp. 66-71, (2020)
  • [16] Caldeira C., Bhowmick P., Komarlingam P., Siek K.A., A State-Based Medication Routine Framework, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-16, (2022)
  • [17] Carlo A.D., Hosseini Ghomi R., Renn B.N., Arean P.A., 2019 by the numbers: Ratings and utilization of behavioral health mobile applications, NPJ Digital Medicine, 2, 1, pp. 1-8, (2019)
  • [18] Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., 2000 Autonomy and self-regulation, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4, pp. 284-291, (2000)
  • [19] Chorpita B.F., Daleiden E.L., Weisz J.R., 2005 Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: A distillation and matching model, Mental Health Services Research, 7, 1, pp. 5-20, (2005)
  • [20] Chung C., Agapie E., Schroeder J., Mishra S., Fogarty J., Munson S.A., When personal tracking becomes social: Examining the use of Instagram for healthy eating, Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1674-1687, (2017)
1234567