Exploring Capturing Approaches in Shared Fabrication Workshops: Current Practice and Opportunities

被引：1
作者：
Rigaud C. [1 ]
Bailly G. [1 ]
Avellino I. [1 ]
Jansen Y. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Sorbonne Université, Cnrs, Isir, Paris
[2] Univ. Bordeaux, Cnrs, Inria, LaBRI, Bordeaux
来源：
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | 2022年 / 6卷
关键词：
capture; fabrication workshop; knowledge resources; makerspace;
D O I：
10.1145/3555116
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Capturing content of fabrication activities is the first step for producing knowledge resources and an integral part of maker culture. As a secondary task, it conflicts though with the fabrication activity, and thus it is often forgotten and knowledge resources end up incomplete. In this article, we investigate different dimensions of content capture for knowledge resources in fabrication workshops. Based on past work in this area, we first propose a framework through which we identify two research directions to investigate. From these, we derive three dimensions to explore in more depth: The number of capturing devices, their feature variety and the degree of automation of each feature. We then explore the design space resulting from these three dimensions with the help of a design concept and an online survey study (N=66). Results show (1) a variety of needs and preferences justifying feature variety and multiplicity, (2) challenges in defining the right degree of manual and automatic control, and (3) the socio-Technical impact of cameras in a shared space regarding privacy and ethics. We conclude with discussions on the benefits and vulnerabilities of equipping fabrication workshop with distributed camera-based capturing devices and offer opportunities for design. © 2022 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Agrawala M., Phan D., Heiser J., Haymaker J., Klingner J., Hanrahan P., Tversky B., Designing effective step-by-step assembly instructions, Acm Transactions on Graphics (TOG, 22, 3, pp. 828-837, (2003)
[2]  
Aizu S., Tsukada K., 2018. Support System for Creating Manufacturing Manual using Smartwatches, Proceedings of the 2018 Acm International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers, pp. 323-326
[3]  
Allen J.E., Guinn C.I., Horvtz E., 1999. Mixed-initiative interaction, Ieee Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 14, 5, pp. 14-23, (1999)
[4]  
Almevik G., Jarefjall P., Samuelsson O., 2013. Tacit Record: Augmented Documentation Methods to Access Traditional Blacksmith Skills, Beyond Control-The Collaborative Museum and Its Challenges International Conference on Design and Digital Heritage (NODEM13), pp. 143-160
[5]  
Annett M., Grossman T., Wigdor D., Fitzmaurice G., 2019 Exploring and Understanding the Role of Workshop Environments in Personal Fabrication Processes, Acm Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26, 2, pp. 1-43
[6]  
Avellino I., Bailly G., Arico M., Morel G., Canlorbe G., 2020. Multimodal and Mixed Control of Robotic Endoscopes, Proceedings of the 2020 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 20), pp. 1-14
[7]  
Baldauf M., Dustdar S., Rosenberg F., 2007. A survey on context-Aware systems, International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 2, 4, pp. 263-277, (2007)
[8]  
Beaudouin-Lafon M., Instrumental Interaction: An Interaction Model for Designing Post-WIMP User Interfaces, Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (the Hague, the Netherlands) (CHI 00), pp. 446-453, (2000)
[9]  
Bledow R., Carette B., Kohnel J., Bister D., 2017 Learning from others failures: The effectiveness of failure stories for managerial learning, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16, 1, pp. 39-53, (2017)
[10]  
Bunt A., Conati C., McGrenere J., Supporting Interface Customization Using a Mixed-Initiative Approach, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (IUI 07), pp. 92-101, (2007)
123456789