Intelligent Vehicle Autonomous Emergency Braking System Considering Safety of the Intended Functionality

被引:0
|
作者
Tan D. [1 ,5 ]
Hu G. [1 ,5 ]
Zhu B. [1 ,5 ]
Jin L. [2 ]
Zhang J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Automotive Engineering Technology, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
[2] Anhui Sanlian Applied Traffic Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei
[3] Ministry of Public Security, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Public Security for Road Traffic Safety, Wuxi
[4] Institute of Intelligent Manufacturing, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
来源
关键词
AEB; Disturbance observer; Optimal safe speed; Perceptual blind scenes; Sliding mode control; SOTIF; STPA;
D O I
10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2022.06.001
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The proposed safety of the intened functionality (SOTIF) has challenged the safety of traditional automatic emergency braking (AEB) system. To deal with it, this paper uses systems-theoretic process analysis (STPA) to obtain the SOTIF requirements of the AEB. On the basis of the traditional AEB, a safety speed planning strategy for the perceptual blind scenes is added. Then, based on the kinematics model of the encounter between the vehicle and the pedestrian in the perceptual blind scenes, the formula of blind scenes safe speed is constructed. Then a speed sliding mode controller with a nonlinear disturbance observer is designed to track and control the speed. Finally, the simulation test is carried out on the joint platform of CarSim and Simulink to compare the safety of the proposed system with the automatic emergency braking system without the intended functional safety requirements, which is further verified via the hardware-in-the-loop experiment. The results show that the AEB considering the SOTIF can effectively reduce the risk of pedestrian collision and ensure the efficiency of vehicles passing through blind spots safely. © 2022, Society of Automotive Engineers of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 807and830
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] HUANG J, WEI W, ZOU D B., Research on multi-mode switching strategy of adaptive cruise control system based on personalized spacing strategy, Automotive Engineering, 42, 10, pp. 1302-1311, (2020)
  • [2] Road vehicles-functional safety: ISO 26262—2018, (2018)
  • [3] LI B, SHANG S L, GUO M G, Et al., Establishment of SOTIF acceptance criteria for autonomous driving, Automobile Technology, 12, pp. 5-9, (2020)
  • [4] MIRKO C., Automated driving: challenges in the interplay between functional safety and safety of the intended functionality, (2018)
  • [5] JOHN B., Safety argument framework for highly automated vehicles
  • [6] SUSANNE E., Bosch case study: application of SOTIF for ADAS
  • [7] LEVESON N., Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety, (2011)
  • [8] MAHAJAN H S, BRADLEY T, PASRICHA S., Application of systems theoretic process analysis to a lane keeping assist system, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 167, (2017)
  • [9] CHEN J Y, LIU L H, ZHOU T R, Et al., Safety analysis and strategy design for decision system of urban autonomous driving vehicles, Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 48, 12, pp. 128-135, (2020)
  • [10] YOSHIHARA Y, MORALES Y, AKAI N, Et al., Autonomous predictive driving for blind intersections, The 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2017), (2017)