Design guidelines for human-robot interaction with assistive robot manipulation systems

被引:4
|
作者
Wilkinson A. [1 ]
Gonzales M. [1 ]
Hoey P. [2 ]
Kontak D. [3 ]
Wang D. [4 ]
Torname N. [2 ]
Sinclaire A. [1 ]
Han Z. [1 ]
Allspaw J. [1 ]
Platt R. [4 ]
Yanco H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML), Lowell, 01854, MA
[2] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML), Lowell, 01854, MA
[3] NERVE Center, University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML), Lowell, 01852, MA
[4] Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, 02115, MA
来源
Paladyn | 2021年 / 12卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
assistive robotics; augmented reality; design guidelines; graphical user interface; human-robot interaction; tangible user interface;
D O I
10.1515/pjbr-2021-0023
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The design of user interfaces (UIs) for assistive robot systems can be improved through the use of a set of design guidelines presented in this article. As an example, the article presents two different UI designs for an assistive manipulation robot system. We explore the design considerations from these two contrasting UIs. The first is referred to as the graphical user interface (GUI), which the user operates entirely through a touchscreen as a representation of the state of the art. The second is a type of novel UI referred to as the tangible user interface (TUI). The TUI makes use of devices in the real world, such as laser pointers and a projector-camera system that enables augmented reality. Each of these interfaces is designed to allow the system to be operated by an untrained user in an open environment such as a grocery store. Our goal is for these guidelines to aid researchers in the design of human-robot interaction for assistive robot systems, particularly when designing multiple interaction methods for direct comparison. © 2021 Alexander Wilkinson et al., published by De Gruyter.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 401
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ArmSym: A Virtual Human-Robot Interaction Laboratory for Assistive Robotics
    Bustamante, Samuel
    Peters, Jan
    Schoelkopf, Bernhard
    Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz
    Jayaram, Vinay
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (06) : 568 - 577
  • [22] Motion planning for human-robot interaction in manipulation tasks
    Esteves, Claudia
    Arechavaleta, Gustavo
    Laumond, Jean-Paul
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATIONS, VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 1766 - 1771
  • [23] The ergonomic design of robot teach pendants for human-robot interaction
    Kwon, KS
    SICE '96 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE: INTERNATIONAL SESSION PAPERS, 1996, : 1233 - 1236
  • [24] Optimized Assistive Human-Robot Interaction Using Reinforcement Learning
    Modares, Hamidreza
    Ranatunga, Isura
    Lewis, Frank L.
    Popa, Dan O.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2016, 46 (03) : 655 - 667
  • [25] Human-robot interaction and robot control
    Sequeira, Joao
    Ribeiro, Maria Isabel
    ROBOT MOTION AND CONTROL: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, 2006, 335 : 375 - 390
  • [26] Bio-inspired Assistive Robotics: Service Dogs as a Model for Human-Robot Interaction and Mobile Manipulation
    Nguyen, Hai
    Kemp, Charles C.
    2008 2ND IEEE RAS & EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB 2008), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 542 - 549
  • [27] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [28] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [29] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [30] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +