Liquid hydrogen storage system for heavy duty trucks: Capacity, dormancy, refueling, and discharge

被引:10
作者
Ahluwalia R.K. [1 ]
Peng J.-K. [1 ]
Roh H.-S. [1 ]
Papadias D. [1 ]
Wang X. [1 ]
Aceves S.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, 60439, IL
[2] National Technological Institute of Mexico, Celaya
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.113
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Continuing the previous work on configuration, performance, cost, and safety of liquid hydrogen (LH2) storage for Class 8 heavy-duty trucks, we examine and demonstrate the feasibility of meeting the targets of 750 mile (1200 km) driving range, 65 kg H2 storage capacity, 8–10 kg/min refueling rate, 4.6 g H2/s peak discharge rate, 1–3 day dormancy, 5000 refueling cycles, 15% gravimetric capacity, 35 g/L volumetric capacity, and $8/kWh total system cost. A thermodynamic model is developed to determine the useable H2 density considering ullage and LH2 heel subject to heat transfer through the multilayer vacuum insulation and dormancy in the limits of “full” and “empty” fuel tanks. Dynamic simulations are conducted to determine the fraction of gaseous H2 returned to the station Dewar during refueling and heat input by H2 recirculation through an in-tank heat exchanger during discharge. The system gravimetric and volumetric capacities are affected by availability of on-board LH2 pump, discharge pressure, and dormancy. Compared to compressed H2 at 350 and 700 bar in carbon fiber wound Type 4 tanks, LH2 storage in double walled, vacuum insulated, low-pressure Type 1 tanks for heavy duty trucks shows advantages of 34–54% higher useable H2 storage density, 59–68% higher gravimetric capacity, 25–48% higher volumetric capacity, and 36–41% lower cost. © 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC
引用
收藏
页码:34120 / 34131
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hua T., Ahluwalia R., Eudy L., Singer G., Jermer B., Asselin-Miller N., Wessel S., Patterson T., Marcinkoski J., Status of hydrogen fuel cell electric buses worldwide, J Power Sources, 269, pp. 975-993, (2014)
  • [2] Ally J., Pryor T., Life cycle costing of diesel, natural gas, hybrid and hydrogen fuel cell bus systems: an Australian case study, Energy Pol, 94, pp. 285-294, (2016)
  • [3] Coleman D., Kopp M., Wagner T., Scheppat B., The value chain of green hydrogen for fuel cell buses – a case study for the Rhine-Main area in Germany, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45, pp. 5122-5133, (2020)
  • [4] Chang C.-C., Liao Y.-T., Chang Y.-W., Life cycle assessment of alternative energy types – including hydrogen – for public city buses in Taiwan, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, pp. 18472-18482, (2019)
  • [5] Correa G., Munoz P., Rodriguez C., A comparative energy and environmental analysis of a diesel, hybrid, hydrogen and electric urban bus, Energy, 187, (2019)
  • [6] Zhang G., Zhang J., Xie T., A solution to renewable hydrogen economy for fuel cell buses - a case study for Zhangjiakou in North China, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45, pp. 14603-14613, (2020)
  • [7] Caponi R., Ferrario A., Zotto L., Bocci E., Hydrogen refueling stations and fuel cell buses four year operational analysis under real-world conditions, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 48, pp. 20957-20970, (2023)
  • [8] Sayer M., Ajanovic A., Haas R., On the economics of a hydrogen bus fleet powered by a wind park – a case study for Austria, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47, pp. 33153-33166, (2022)
  • [9] Lee Y., Jung J., Song H., Public acceptance of hydrogen buses through policy instrument: local government perceptions in Changwon city, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 48, pp. 13377-13389, (2023)
  • [10] Wang Z., Yu J., Li G., Zhug C., Chen A., Time for hydrogen buses? Dynamic analysis of the Hong Kong bus market, Transport Res D-TRE, 115, (2023)