Lay individuals' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered healthcare systems

被引:1
作者
Zhang Z. [1 ]
Genc Y. [1 ]
Xing A. [2 ]
Wang D. [3 ]
Fan X. [4 ]
Citardi D. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Computer Science and Information Systems, Pace University, New York, NY
[2] Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
[3] IBM Research, X, Cambridge, MA
[4] Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
关键词
acceptability; artificial intelligence; diagnostic results; healthcare; trust;
D O I
10.1002/pra2.326
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, patient-facing applications have started embodying this novel technology to deliver timely healthcare information and services to the patient. However, little is known about lay individuals' perceptions and acceptance of AI-driven, patient-facing health systems. In this study, we conducted a survey with 203 participants to investigate their perceptions about using AI to consult information related to their diagnostic results and what factors influence their perceptions. Our results showed that despite the awareness and experience of patient-facing AI systems being low amongst our participants, people had a generally positive attitude towards such systems. A majority of participants indicated a high level of comfortability and willingness to use health AI systems, and agreed AI could help them comprehend diagnostic results. Several intrinsic factors, such as education background and technology literacy, play an important role in people's perceptions of using AI to comprehend diagnostic results. In particular, people with high technology and health literacy, and education levels had more experiences with using AI and tended to trust AI outputs. We conclude this paper by discussing the implications of this work, with an emphasis on enhancing the trustworthiness of AI and bridging the digital divide. © 2020, John Wiley and Sons Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Basu P. A., Ruiz-Wibbelsmann J. A., Spielman S. B., Van Dalsem V. F., Rosenberg J. K., Glazer G. M., Creating a patient-centered imaging service: Determining what patients want, American Journal of Roentgenology, 196, 3, pp. 605-610, (2011)
  • [2] Chen Y., Cheng K., Tang C., Siek K. A., Bardram J. E., Is my doctor listening to me?: impact of health it systems on patient-provider interaction, CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2013)
  • [3] Crutzen R., Peters G.-J. Y., Portugal S. D., Fisser E. M., Grolleman J. J., An artificially intelligent chat agent that answers adolescents' questions related to sex, drugs, and alcohol: An exploratory study, Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 5, pp. 514-519, (2011)
  • [4] Curioni-Fontecedro A., A new era of oncology through artificial intelligence, (2017)
  • [5] Ghosh S., Bhatia S., Bhatia A., Quro: Facilitating user symptom check using a personalised Chatbot-oriented dialogue system, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 252, pp. 51-56, (2018)
  • [6] Gratch J., Lucas G. M., King A. A., Morency L.-P., It's only a computer: the impact of human-agent interaction in clinical interviews, Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, (2014)
  • [7] Grolleman J., van Dijk B., Nijholt A., van Emst A., Break the habit! Designing an e-therapy intervention using a virtual coach in aid of smoking cessation, International Conference on Persuasive Technology, (2006)
  • [8] Hong M. K., Feustel C., Agnihotri M., Silverman M., Simoneaux S. F., Wilcox L., Supporting families in reviewing and communicating about radiology imaging studies, Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2017)
  • [9] Jiang F., Jiang Y., Zhi H., Dong Y., Li H., Ma S., Wang Y., Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future, Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2, 4, pp. 230-243, (2017)
  • [10] Kizilcec R. F., How much information? Effects of transparency on trust in an algorithmic interface, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2016)