Integrating energy markets: Implications of increasing electricity trade on prices and emissions in the Western United States

被引:0
作者
Dahlke S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, 80401, CO
关键词
Electricity; Energy; Market integration;
D O I
10.5278/ijsepm.3416
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents empirically-estimated average hourly relationships between regional electricity trade in the western United States (US) and prices, emissions, and generation from 2015 through 2018. It provides new evidence of the short term impacts of integrating markets to inform electricity market policymakers. Consistent with economic theory, the analysis finds a negative relationship between electricity price in California and regional trade, conditional on local demand. Each 1 GWh increase in California electricity imports is associated with an average $0.15 per MWh decrease in the California Independent System Operator’s (CAISO) wholesale electricity price. There is a net-negative short-term relationship between CO2 emissions in California and electricity imports that is partially offset by positive emissions from exporting neighbors. Specifically, each 1 GWh increase in regional trade is associated with a net 70-ton average decrease in CO2 emissions across the western U.S., conditional on demand levels. The results provide evidence that electricity imports mostly displace natural gas generation on the margin in the California electricity market. A small positive relationship is observed between short-run SO2 and NOx emissions in neighboring regions and California electricity imports. The magnitude of the SO2 and NOx results suggest an average increase of 0.1 MWh from neighboring coal plants is associated with a 1 MWh increase in imports to California. © 2020, Aalborg University press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 60
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Hayek F.A., The Use of Knowledge in Society, Am Econ Rev, 35, pp. 519-530, (1945)
[2]  
Coase R.H., The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4, pp. 386-405, (1937)
[3]  
Riordan M.H., Williamson O.E., Asset specificity and economic organization, Int J Ind Organ, 3, pp. 365-378, (1985)
[4]  
Chang J.W., Pfeifenberger J.P., Aydin C.O., Aydin M.G., Horn K.V., Cahill P., Et al., Senate Bill 350 Study Volume V: Production Cost Analysis. the Brattle Group, (2016)
[5]  
Mansur E.T., White M.W., Market Organization and Efficiency in Electricity Markets, Work Pap, (2012)
[6]  
Jamasb T., Pollitt M., Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization & Integration, Energy J, 26, pp. 11-41, (2005)
[7]  
Newbery D., Strbac G., Viehoff I., The benefits of integrating European electricity markets, Energy Policy, 94, pp. 253-263, (2016)
[8]  
Verbruggen A., Nucci R.D., Fischedick M., Haas R., Hvelplund F., Lauber V., Et al., Europe’s electricity regime: Restoration or thorough transition, Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag, 5, pp. 57-68, (2015)
[9]  
Amundsen E.S., Bergman L., Integration of multiple national markets for electricity: The case of Norway and Sweden, Energy Policy, 35, pp. 3383-3394, (2007)
[10]  
Lundgren J., Hellstrom J., Rudholm N., Multinational electricity market integration and electricity price dynamics. 2008, Conf. Eur. Electr. Mark., pp. 1-6, (2008)