An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for evaluating suppliers' co-design ability in new product development

被引:0
|
作者
Sumrit D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cluster of Logistics and Rail Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, 25/25 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom
关键词
Fuzzy SWARA; Fuzzy TOPSIS; MCDM; Multi-criteria decision making; New product development; NPD;
D O I
10.1504/IJADS.2020.106417
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many methods for managing the complexity and challenges of new product development (NPD) under faster emerging technology. Most firms use them to collaborate with external organisations for their co-design on new products. This study purposes to provide a measurement model by applying multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to evaluate suppliers' co-design capabilities in NPD in terms of product structural design and engineering, product concept and functional design, and process design. This MCDM includes fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) to determine the relative weights of criteria and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank the results of suppliers' capabilities regarding to their co-design in NPD. Given the result, supplier with the highest collaboration performance rating is selected at first. The evaluation of suppliers' collaboration is regarded as an essential starting point for management challenge to develop suppliers' capabilities. © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 246
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management
    Chang, Tsung-Han
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2009, 179 (04) : 355 - 370
  • [32] Multi-criteria decision making as a tool for sustainable product development - Benefits and obstacles
    Buchert, Tom
    Neugebauer, Sabrina
    Schenker, Sebastian
    Lindow, Kai
    Stark, Rainer
    12TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - EMERGING POTENTIALS, 2015, 26 : 70 - 75
  • [33] An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Grey Theory for Evaluating Urban Public Transportation Systems
    Alkharabsheh, Ahmad
    Moslem, Sarbast
    Oubahman, Laila
    Duleba, Szabolcs
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 15
  • [34] An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for prioritising strategies to drive the sustainable roll-on/roll-off port development: a case study of Thailand
    Sumrit D.
    Jaidee R.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2023, 17 (01) : 1 - 35
  • [35] Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems
    Chen, Na
    Xu, Zeshui
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 292 : 175 - 197
  • [36] An integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for health technology assessment
    Karatas, Mumtaz
    Karacan, Ilknur
    Tozan, Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (04) : 504 - 534
  • [37] Evaluating Websites of Specialized Cultural Content Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Theories
    Kabassi, Katerina
    Botonis, Athanasios
    Karydis, Christos
    INFORMATICA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2020, 44 (01): : 45 - 54
  • [38] A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making
    Hanine, Mohamed
    Boutkhoum, Omar
    Tikniouine, Abdessadek
    Agouti, Tarik
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [39] Evaluating the service quality of airports in Thailand using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method
    Pandey, Mukesh Mohan
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 : 241 - 249
  • [40] Evaluating digital maturity in specialized enterprises: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Zhu, Yanmin
    Wan, Huanyu
    Carlos, Llopis-Albert
    Ye, Junhong
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2025, 21 (01)