Machine learning paradigms in high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou P. [1 ,2 ]
Cheng G. [1 ,2 ]
Yao X. [1 ,2 ]
Han J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Research and Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen
[2] School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Deep learning; Few-shot learning; Machine learning paradigm; Reinforcement learning; Remote sensing image interpretation; Weakly supervised learning;
D O I
10.11834/jrs.20210164
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
High-resolution remote sensing image interpretation is a major topic in remote sensing information processing. It plays a vital role in the knowledge mining and intelligent analysis of remote sensing big data and has important application values in civil and military fields. The traditional methods of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation generally use manual visual interpretation, which is time consuming and laborious and has low accuracy. Therefore, interpreting high-resolution remote sensing images automatically and efficiently is an urgent problem to be solved. The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology in recent years has made machine learning the mainstream research direction of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation. In this study, we systematically review five kinds of representative machine learning paradigms on the basis of the typical tasks of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation, such as object detection, scene classification, semantic segmentation, and hyperspectral image classification. Specifically, we introduce their definitions, typical methods, and applications. The representative machine learning paradigms include supervised learning (e.g., support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, decision tree, random tree, and probabilistic graph model), semi-supervised learning (e.g., pure semi-supervised learning, transductive learning, and active learning), weakly supervised learning (e.g., multiple instance learning), unsupervised learning (e.g., clustering, principal component analysis, and sparse coding), and deep learning (e.g., stacked auto-encoder, deep belief network, convolutional neural network, and generative adversarial network). Then, we comprehensively analyze the strengths and limitations of the five kinds of machine learning paradigms and summarize their typical applications in remote sensing image interpretation. Finally, we summarize the development direction of high-resolution remote sensing image interpretation, such as few-shot learning, unsupervised deep learning, and reinforcement learning. © 2021, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 197
页数:15
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [21] Cheng G, Yang C Y, Yao X W, Guo L, Han J W., When deep learning meets metric learning: remote sensing image scene classification via learning discriminative CNNs, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56, 5, pp. 2811-2821, (2018)
  • [22] Cheng G, Zhou P C, Han J W., Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54, 12, pp. 7405-7415, (2016)
  • [23] Cheng G, Zhou P C, Han J W., RIFD-CNN: rotation-invariant and fisher discriminative convolutional neural networks for object detection, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2884-2893, (2016)
  • [24] Cheng G, Zhou P C, Han J W., Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54, 12, pp. 7405-7415, (2016)
  • [25] Cheng G, Zhou P C, Han J W, Guo L, Han J G., Auto-encoder-based shared mid-level visual dictionary learning for scene classification using very high resolution remote sensing images, IET Computer Vision, 9, 5, pp. 639-647, (2015)
  • [26] Cheng L, Liu X, Li L L, Jiao L C, Tang X., Deep adaptive proposal network for object detection in optical remote sensing images, (2018)
  • [27] Cortes C, Vapnik V., Support-vector networks, Machine Learning, 20, 3, pp. 273-297, (1995)
  • [28] Cover T, Hart P., Nearest neighbor pattern classification, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13, 1, pp. 21-27, (1967)
  • [29] Deng C, Xue Y M, Liu X L, Li C, Tao D C., Active transfer learning network: a unified deep joint spectral-spatial feature learning model for hyperspectral image classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57, 3, pp. 1741-1754, (2019)
  • [30] Ding J, Xue N, Long Y, Xia G S, Lu Q K., Learning RoI transformer for oriented object detection in aerial images, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2844-2853, (2019)