Performance of cone meter for measuring cryogenic fluid considering cavitation

被引:1
作者
He D. [1 ]
Chang Z. [1 ]
Bai B. [2 ]
Chen S. [1 ]
Guo P. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulic in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, NO.5 South Jinhua Road, Xi’an
[2] State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, No.28, Xianning West Road, Xi’an
来源
International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems | 2019年 / 12卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cone meter; Cryogenic fluid; Discharge coefficient; Flow rate measurement; Pressure loss coefficient;
D O I
10.5293/IJFMS.2019.12.1.012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The performance of the cone meter when measuring the cryogenic fluid was investigated by numerical simulation. The results show that the discharge coefficient and pressure loss coefficient of the cone meter are almost constant when the Reynolds number in the “stable region”. The cryogenic fluids, especially the liquid hydrogen, have wider stable Reynolds number ranges than the water. There is little effect of cavitation on the discharge coefficient and pressure loss coefficient at the initial stage of cavitation. Thus the effect of slight cavitation on the measurement error of the flow rate is small, whose relative error is less than ±0.5% in present cases. This study opens a new avenue for measuring the flow rate of the cryogenic fluid. © 2019, Turbomachinery Society of Japan. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Wet Gas Flowmetering Guideline (ASME MFC-19G-2008), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, (2008)
  • [2] Ifft S.A., V-Cone: An alternative to orifice meter in wet gas applications, North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop 1999, (1999)
  • [3] Hollingshead C.L., Discharge Coefficient Performance of Venturi Standard Concentric Orifice Plate, V-Cone, and Wedge Flow Meters at Small Reynolds Numbers, (2011)
  • [4] Advanced Differential Pressure Flowmeter Technology, (2017)
  • [5] He D.H., Bai B.F., Gas-liquid two phase flow with high GVF through a horizontal V-Cone throttle device, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 91, pp. 51-62, (2017)
  • [6] Stephen A.I., Permanent Pressure Loss Comparison among Various Flowmeter Technologies, (2014)
  • [7] He D.H., Bai B.F., Two-phase mass flow coefficient of V-Cone throttle device, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 57, pp. 77-85, (2016)
  • [8] Steven R., Horizontally installed cone differential pressure meter wet gas flow performance, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 20, 4-5, pp. 152-167, (2009)
  • [9] He D.H., Bai B.F., Xu Y., Li X., “A new model for the V-Cone meter in low pressure wet gas metering, Measurement Science and Technology, 23, 12, pp. 125301-125309, (2012)
  • [10] Xu Y., Yu Z., Zhang T., Li G., Influence of key factors on discharge coefficient in V-Cone Flowmeter, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering-English, 44, 12, pp. 105-121, (2008)