Application of CFS-PML in complex velocity models

被引:0
|
作者
Yang X. [1 ]
Zhang W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
[2] Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Sou-thern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen
[3] Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Deep offshore Oil and Gas Exploration Technology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen
来源
Zhang, Wei (zhangwei@sustech.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 55期
关键词
Complex frequency-shifted perfectly matched layer(CFS-PML); Complex velocity model; Numerical simulation; Parameter settings;
D O I
10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2020.06.013
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In numerical simulation of seismic wave,the limited space size of discrete grids usually leads to artificial reflections when calculating the outermost layer of the model.The perfectly matched layer (PML) method has achieved good results in absorbing artificial reflections,of which the complex frequency-shifted perfectly matched layer (CFS-PML) is particularly effective.Many studies that discussed the optimal settings of the CFS-PML parameters only consider homogeneous velocity models.However,there are usually complex velocity models with strong heterogeneous in field applications.Therefore,the CFS-PML parameters setting method of complex velocity models is explored based on the setting method of homogeneous velocity models.It is considered that the parameter setting is not only related to the source and grid properties,but also to the velocity of the absorption layer and the wavelength,that is,highly dependent on the velocity model.For a complex velocity model,the key to parameter setting is how to select a reference velocity,and three practical selection methods of reference velocity are given.By testing and comparing the absorption effects of three complex models,i.e.double-layer,multi-layer and Marmousi models, the best reference velocity selection method is defined as the median velocity of boundary medium,and then the setting method of CFS-PML optimization parameters for complex velocity models is proposed. © 2020, Editorial Department OIL GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1281
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Berenger J P., A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, Journal of Computational Physics, 114, 2, pp. 185-200, (1994)
  • [2] Chew W C, Liu Q H., Perfectly matched layers for elastodynamics:A new absorbing boundary condition [J], Journal of Computational Acoustics, 4, 4, pp. 341-359, (1996)
  • [3] Collino F, Tsogka C., Application of the perfectly matched absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media[J], Geophysics, 66, 1, pp. 294-307, (2001)
  • [4] Komatitsch D, Tromp J., A perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition for the second-order seismic wave equation[J], Geophysical Journal International, 154, 1, pp. 146-153, (2003)
  • [5] Festa G, Vilotte J P., The Newmark scheme as velocity- stress time-staggering:an efficient PML implementation for spectral element simulations of elastodyna-mics[J], Geophysical Journal International, 161, 3, pp. 789-812, (2005)
  • [6] GUO Nianmin, WU Guochen, High-order finite difference method in reverse-time migration with variable grids based on PML boundary condition, Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 47, 2, pp. 256-265, (2012)
  • [7] GAO Zhenghui, SUN Jianguo, SUN Zhangqing, Et al., 2.5D acoustic approximate equation numerical simulation with a new construction method of the perfectly matched layer, Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 51, 6, pp. 1128-1133, (2016)
  • [8] Kuzuoglu M, Mittra R., Frequency dependence of the constitutive parameters of causal perfectly matched anisotropic absorbers[J], IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, 6, 12, pp. 447-449, (1996)
  • [9] Roden J A, Gedney S D., Convolution PML (CPML):An efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS-PML for arbitrary media[J], Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 27, 5, pp. 334-339, (2000)
  • [10] LI Peixiao, LIN Weijun, ZHANG Xiumei, Et al., Comparisons for regular splitting and non-splitting perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary conditions, Acta Acustica, 40, 1, pp. 44-53, (2015)