VCS and CVS: New combined parametric and non-parametric operation research models

被引：15

作者：

Mirmozaffari M. ^{[1
]}

Yazdani R. ^{[2
]}

Shadkam E. ^{[3
]}

Tavassoli L.S. ^{[1
]}

Massah R. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX

[2] Department of Management, Islamic Azad University Chalous branch, Chalous

[3] Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khayyam University, Mashhad

[4] Department of civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX

来源：

Sustainable Operations and Computers | 2021年 / 2卷

关键词：

CVS and VCS models; Financial institutions; Operation research; Optimization; Parametric and non-parametric methods;

D O I：

10.1016/j.susoc.2021.03.002

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The constancy of efficacy derived from parametric and non-parametric is not significant, this paper provides a scientific assessment and proposes two novel combined parametric and non-parametric operation research models, which will be a new experiment in literature perception. A scientific assessment of banks based on two novel optimizations VRS-CRS-SFA (VCS) and CRS-VRS-SFA (CVS) as the combination of the efficiency measurement method of CCR(Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes model) or CRS(Constant Return to Scale), BCC(Banker, Charnes, and Cooper model) or VRS(Variable Return to Scale) in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), as well as Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) for 65 banks during Feb to July 2020 are introduced. For analyzing the performance of the parametric and non-parametric approaches, we have considered the linear regression and Unreplicated Linear Functional Relationship (ULFR). Finally, the superior bank and the best performance model are introduced. For more clarification, three different approaches, which are production, intermediation, and profit/revenue in financial institutions, are considered. Among the proposed techniques, the two novel recommended VCS and CVS compared with BCC-CCR, CCR-BCC, and SFA models, in all of the three suggested approaches have a more positive correlation with profit risk and show the higher coefficient of determination values. © 2021 The Author(s)

引用

页码：36 / 56

页数：20

共 46 条

[1]

Aigner D., Lovell C.K., Schmidt P., Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, J. Econ., 6, 1, pp. 21-37, (1977)

[2]

Charnes A., Cooper W., Rousseau J., Semple J., Data envelopment analysis and axiomatic notions of efficiency and reference sets, Texas univ at Austin Center for Cybernetic Studies, (1987)

[3]

Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Manage. Sci., 30, 9, pp. 1078-1092, (1984)

[4]

Bauer P.W., Berger A.N., Ferrier G.D., Humphrey D.B., Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: a comparison of frontier efficiency methods, J. Econ. Bus., 50, 2, pp. 85-114, (1998)

[5]

Coelli T.J., Rao D.S.P., O'Donnell C.J., Battese G.E., An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, (2005)

[6]

Greene W.H., The econometric approach to efficiency analysis, Measure. Product. Efficiency, 1, 1, pp. 92-250, (2008)

[7]

Lovell C.K., Production frontiers and productive efficiency, Measure. Prod. Efficiency, 3, (1993)

[8]

Eisenbeis R., Ferrier G.D., Kwan S.H., (1999)

[9]

Huang T.H., Wang M.H., Comparison of economic efficiency estimation methods: Parametric and non–parametric techniques, The Manchester School, 70, 5, pp. 682-709, (2002)

[10]

Resti A., Evaluating the cost-efficiency of the Italian banking system: what can be learned from the joint application of parametric and non-parametric techniques, J. Bank. Finance, 21, 2, pp. 221-250, (1997)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →