A low complexity algorithm for efficiency optimization of dual active bridge converters

被引:10
作者
Pistollato S. [1 ]
Zanatta N. [1 ]
Caldognetto T. [1 ]
Mattavelli P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, Vicenza
来源
IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics | 2021年 / 2卷
关键词
Dual active bridge (DAB); light-load operation; maximum efficiency point identification; TPS optimization; zero voltage switching (ZVS);
D O I
10.1109/OJPEL.2021.3053058
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper proposes a triple phase shift modulation (TPS) with an optimization technique that aims at maximizing the efficiency of the dual active bridge converter. Such a converter is often used to interface renewable or energy storage systems in smart dc power systems, where loss minimization via TPS is crucial, especially at light-load conditions. In this paper, favorable modulation parameters are found first, aiming at minimum rms currents and zero voltage switching, by considering only some fundamental converter parameters, namely, the input and output voltages, the transformer ratio, and the leakage inductance. Then, on the basis of the closed-form analytical description of the converter behavior over the determined modulation patterns, trajectories in the modulation planes that are capable of improving the total efficiency are identified. It is shown that such trajectories lead to close-to-optimal efficiency operation, which can be exploited to implement fast perturb-and-observe methods requiring just minimal converter parameters knowledge. The results are verified experimentally on a 1.5-kW prototype. It is shown that the proposed approach achieves close-to-optimal efficiency operation under different input voltages, being the error with respect to the measured optimal points obtained by a brute-force approach lower than about 0.2%. © 2020 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 32
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Liu G., Khodamoradi A., Mattavelli P., Caldognetto T., Magnone P., Plug and play DC-DC converters for smart DC nanogrids with advanced control ancillary services, Proc. IEEE 23rd Intern. Workshop Comput. Aided Modeling Des. Commun. Links Netw., pp. 1-6, (2018)
  • [2] Carignano M., Roda V., Costa-Castello R., Valino L., Lozano A., Barreras F., Assessment of energy management in a fuel cell/battery hybrid vehicle, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 16110-16122, (2019)
  • [3] Buticchi G., Bozhko S., Liserre M., Wheeler P., Al-Haddad K., On-board microgrids for the more electric aircraft-technology review, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 66, 7, pp. 5588-5599, (2019)
  • [4] Krismer F., Kolar J.W., Closed form solution for minimum conduction loss modulation of DAB converters, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 27, 1, pp. 174-188, (2012)
  • [5] Krismer F., Kolar J.W., Efficiency-optimized high-current dual active bridge converter for automotive applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 59, 7, pp. 2745-2760, (2012)
  • [6] Sankaranarayanan V., Gao Y., Erickson R.W., Maksimovic D., Online efficiency optimization of a closed-loop controlled SiC-based boost converter, Proc. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., pp. 285-291, (2020)
  • [7] Shi K., Deng J., Xu D., A general pulse width modulation method for zero-voltage-switching active-clamping three-phase power converters: Edge aligned pulse width modulation (EA-PWM), IEEE Open J. Power Electron., 1, pp. 250-259, (2020)
  • [8] Yeh C., Yu O., Zhao X., Lai J., Dual-loop-controlled coupledinductor buck converter in low-power applications, IEEE Open J. Power Electron., 1, pp. 24-33, (2020)
  • [9] Burmester D., Rayudu R., Seah W., Akinyele D., A review of nanogrid topologies and technologies, Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 67, pp. 760-775, (2017)
  • [10] Forouzesh M., Siwakoti Y.P., Gorji S.A., Blaabjerg F., Lehman B., Step-up DC-DC converters: A comprehensive review of voltageboosting techniques, topologies, and applications, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 32, 12, pp. 9143-9178, (2017)