Indonesia's land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change

被引:0
作者
Resosudarmo I.A.P. [1 ]
Tacconi L. [1 ]
Sloan S. [2 ]
Hamdani F.A.U. [3 ]
Subarudi [3 ]
Alviya I. [3 ]
Muttaqin M.Z. [3 ]
机构
[1] Crawford School of Public Policy, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, J.G. Crawford Building (Blg 132), Canberra, 2601, ACT
[2] Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, 4870, Queensland
[3] Centre for Socio-economic, Policy and Climate Change Research and Development, Forestry and Environmental R&D and Innovation Agency (FOERDIA), Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Republic of Indonesia
关键词
Climate change; Indonesia; Land reform; Livelihoods; Social forestry;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the main components of Indonesia's Just Economy policy is extensive and rapid land reform, which targets about 12% of the country's land area for redistribution to farmers and communities by 2019. Much of the reform is occurring on forest land. At the same time, the country has pledged a significant reduction of its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, two thirds of which is to be achieved from forests. Hence agrarian reform potentially conflicts with emission reduction commitments. This research analyses how the redistribution of forests, with emphasis on the social forestry program, might affect people's livelihoods and Indonesia's capacity to deliver on its climate change commitments. With reference to Central Kalimantan province, we find that the land reform policy has increased the area distributed to local people through the streamlining of processes. However, ambitious targets and hurried distribution of land have posed significant challenges for processes and implementation. They result in partial understanding of the schemes, rights and responsibilities, inappropriate site allocation and types of forestland being distributed, and inadequate consideration for community capacity and local governance. Importantly, the resources allocated to grant these rights have not been accompanied by equal attention to foster subsequent actual land-based livelihood activities and forest protection. Hence the reform's potential to improve local livelihoods and contribute to climate change mitigation in Central Kalimantan is unlikely to be fully realized in the near future. We suggest that careful consideration be given to the processes of distribution, the type of forests being assigned, attention and support to foster implementation, and monitoring and enforcement of regulations. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Abram N.K., Meijaard E., Wilson K.A., Davis J.T., Wells J.A., Ancrenaz M., Budiharta S., Durrant A., Runting R.K., Gaveau D., Mengersen K., Oil Palm Ecommunity Conflict Mapping in Indonesia: A Case for Better Community Liaison in Planning for Development Initiatives, 78, (2017)
  • [2] Agrawal A., Gibson C.C., Enchantment and disenchanment: the role of community in natural resource conservation, World Dev., 27, pp. 629-649, (1999)
  • [3] Amianti G.D., RI Targets 3 Ares for Reducing Inequality, (2017)
  • [4] Barr C., Et al., Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia, (2006)
  • [5] BAPPENAS, Ditjen Sumber Daya Air, Partners for Water Program, Quick Assessment and Nationwide Screening (QANS) of Peat and Lowland Resources and Action Planning for the Implementation of a National Lowland Strategy. PVW3A10002 Agentschap NL 6201068 QANS Lowland Development. Report on QNAS Component 4, (2013)
  • [6] Besley T., Burgess R., Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: evidence from India, Q. J. Econ., (2000)
  • [7] Bowler D.E., Buyung-Ali L.M., Healey J.R., Jones J.P.G., Knight T.M., Pullin A.S., Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?, Front. Ecol. Environ., 10, pp. 29-36, (2012)
  • [8] Bray D.B., Merino-perez L., Negreros-castillo P., Segura-warnholtz G., Torres-rojo J.M., Vester H.F.M., Mexico's community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes, Conserv. Biol., 17, pp. 672-677, (2003)
  • [9] Colfer C.J.P., Resosudarmo I.A.P., Which Way Forward?, (2002)
  • [10] Edmunds D., Wollenberg E., Whose devolution is it anyway?: Divergent constructs, interests and capacities between the poorest forest users and states, The Impacts of Devolution Policies, pp. 150-165, (2003)