AI-augmented failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (AI-FMECA) for industrial applications

被引:1
作者
Grabill, Nicholas [1 ]
Wang, Stephanie [2 ]
Olayinka, Hammed A. [3 ]
De Alwis, Tharindu P. [3 ]
Khalil, Yehia F. [5 ]
Zou, Jian [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Math, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Math, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Math Sci, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[4] Worcester Polytech Inst, Data Sci Program, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Reliability assessment; Risk assessment; dFMECA; dFMEA; Partial information;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2024.110308
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Design failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (d-FMECA)2 is a bottom-up, semi-quantitative risk assessment approach that is used by reliability engineers across all industries (nuclear, chemical, environmental, pharmaceuticals, aerospace, etc.) for identifying the effects of postulated components failure modes such as solenoid-operated valves (SOV), motor-operated valves (MOV), controllers, pumps, sensors of various types, printed circuit boards (PCBs). This research aims to develop a novel AI-augmented tool that guides, in realtime, the risk-analyst to a host of potential failure modes and their effects for each component contained in a bigger system. Through a user-friendly graphical interface and a robust statistical modeling backend, the AI-driven tool streamlines the risk assessment process by prompting the risk analyst to input a system's name and subsequently generate an extensive array of failure modes and associated effects for each constituent component within the system. This AI-augmented tool allows the user to select either a simplified d-FMEA or a detailed d-FMECA for the system under investigation. This novel AI-driven tool offers significant effort and time savings in conducting d-FMECA, which is known to be a labor-intensive engineering task. In addition, this tool can be used for training risk and reliability professionals.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Response surface design evaluation and comparison
    Anderson-Cook, Christine M.
    Borror, Connie M.
    Montgomery, Douglas C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2009, 139 (02) : 629 - 641
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, Statistical models and methods for lifetime data
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1980, Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis MIL-STD-1629A
  • [5] Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation
    Bae, Jinwoo
    Xi, Zhimin
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 226
  • [6] Barlow R. E., 1975, Stochastic Processes & their Applications, V3, P153, DOI 10.1016/0304-4149(75)90013-7
  • [7] Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) using an interval number based logistic regression model
    Bhattacharjee, Pushparenu
    Dey, Vidyut
    Mandal, U. K.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 132
  • [8] Reliability Assurance for AI Systems
    Blood, Jonathan C.
    Herbert, Nathan W.
    Wayne, Martin R.
    [J]. 2023 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, RAMS, 2023,
  • [9] Data-Driven Approach for Fault Prognosis of SiC MOSFETs
    Chen, Weiqiang
    Zhang, Lingyi
    Krishna, Pattipati
    Bazzi, Ali M.
    Joshi, Shailesh
    Dede, Ercan M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2020, 35 (04) : 4048 - 4062
  • [10] An integrated RFUCOM - RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry
    Dhalmahapatra, Krantiraditya
    Garg, Ashish
    Singh, Kritika
    Xavier, Nirmal Francis
    Maiti, J.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 221