vine-Copula Based Dynamic Risk VaR Assessment Method for Operation Profit and Loss of Generation Companies

被引:0
作者
Xie M. [1 ]
Hu X. [1 ]
Ke S. [2 ]
Cheng P. [1 ]
Liu M. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou
[2] State Grid Fuzhou Power Supply Company, Fuzhou
来源
Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems | 2019年 / 43卷 / 05期
关键词
Dynamic economic dispatch; Electricity market; Operating profit and loss of generation companies (GenCos); Value at risk (VaR); Vine-Copula;
D O I
10.7500/AEPS20180612006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the power market environment, the fluctuation of load and electricity price, the random output of renewable power supply, the change of network topology, the adjustment of the system operation mode and a large number of uncertainties add risks for the operating income of generation companies (GenCos). In order to help GenCos accurately evaluate their own risks and formulate appropriate bidding strategies and generating unit plans, a vine-Copula theory based value at risk (VaR) evaluation model is presented for the profit and loss of GenCos. Firstly, based on the AC power flow, the optimal power flow model for day-ahead dynamic economic dispatch of power grid is established to calculate the locational marginal price. Then, the pair-Copula theory is introduced to construct the high dimensional vine-Copula dependent structure of the profit and loss functions of GenCos. Finally, the VaRs of operating combined risk of GenCos under different confidence levels are calculated based on the definition of VaR. The example of IEEE 39-bus system is taken to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model and method. © 2019 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45and52
页数:4513
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Ma L., Wen F., Ni Y., Et al., Risk-constrained optimal bidding strategies for generation companies in electricity market environment, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 27, 23, pp. 6-11, (2003)
[2]  
Rodriguez C.P., Anders G.J., Bidding strategy design for different types of electric power market participants, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19, 2, pp. 964-971, (2004)
[3]  
Huang H., Li F., Bidding strategy for wind generation considering conventional generation and transmission constraints, Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 3, 1, pp. 51-62, (2015)
[4]  
Zhu J., Zhang Y., Yang Z., Et al., An analytical method for reliability evaluation of generation system with wind farm, Proceedings of the CSEE, 16, 16, pp. 4671-4679, (2017)
[5]  
Lisnianski A., Elmakias D., Laredo D., Et al., A multi-state Markov model for a short-term reliability analysis of a power generating unit, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 98, 1, pp. 1-6, (2012)
[6]  
Roy B., Rajesh K., Yi G., Et al., Adequacy assessment considerations in wind integrated power systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27, 4, pp. 2297-2305, (2012)
[7]  
Liu W., Qin H., Wang L., Et al., Coordinated planning of photovoltaic/battery energy storage and planned island in distribution networks considering risk of lost load, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 41, 19, pp. 30-36, (2017)
[8]  
Ding M., Qian Y., Zhang J., Et al., Coordinated control model of power system cascading failures based on risk assessment, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 40, 7, pp. 1-8, (2016)
[9]  
Jiang C., Liu W., Zhang J., Et al., Risk assessment of generation and transmission systems considering wind power penetration, Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 29, 2, pp. 260-270, (2014)
[10]  
Kang C., Bai L., Xia Q., Et al., Risk decision-making of generators in electricity market, Proceedings of the CSEE, 24, 8, pp. 4-9, (2004)