Adaptive threshold method for active fire identification based on GF-4 PMI data

被引：0
作者：
Liu S. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Qin X. [1 ]
Sun G. [1 ]
Liu Q. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Institute of Forest Reseources Information Technique, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Forestry Remote Sensing, Beijing
来源：
Yaogan Xuebao/Journal of Remote Sensing | 2020年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词：
Adaptive method; Fire point; GF-4; Split-window method; Threshold detection;
D O I：
10.11834/jrs.202018297
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
GF-4 is China's first geostationary orbit optical remote sensing satellite with high-resolution ground observation. Compared with other meteorological satellites, it has a single medium-wave infrared channel with the characteristics of high spatial and temporal resolution. To explore the application of GF-4 panchromatic multispectral and medium wave infrared (PMI) in forest fire detection and provide a new method for forest fire monitoring in China. Yulong autonomous county of Yunnan province, the Amur region and the outer Baikal frontier of Russia were selected as experimental areas. During the forest fires in the experimental areas in 2017 and 2018, 12 scene images of GF-4 PMI were obtained, of which 8 scene images were used as the experimental group, and 4 scene images were used as the verification group. Statistical analysis was performed on the typical characteristics of the experimental group images, and the 'split window method' was used to construct an adaptive threshold detection algorithm, then the detection algorithm was used to detect the images of the verification group and compared with the results by visually interpreted. The results showed that the detection of forest fire points in Yulong autonomous county of Yunnan province, the accuracy of the algorithm in this paper was 80.0%, the omission detection rate was 20.0%, and the comprehensive evaluation index, which was based on the verification of fire detection, was 0.781. The detection of forest fire points in the outer Baikal frontier of Russia, the accuracy of the algorithm detection was 99.1%, the omission detection rate was 24.3%, and the comprehensive evaluation index was 0.858. The forest fire of 2017 in the Amur region, the accuracy of the algorithm detection was 97.7%, the omission detection rate was 22.2%, and the comprehensive evaluation index was 0.866. The forest fire of 2018 in the Amur region, the accuracy of the algorithm detection was 92.4%, the omission detection rate was 14.5%, and the comprehensive evaluation index was 0.889. The accuracy of the fire points detection in these three experimental areas was higher than 80.0%, the comprehensive evaluation index set based on the accuracy verification of the fire point detection was higher than 0.780. This algorithm could realize the fire point detection of GF-4 PMI images, and the algorithm had a higher accuracy rate of fire point detection in a large range of forest fire, but the omission detection rate of the algorithm was high and needs to be further optimized. The experimental results showed that the proposed algorithm was reliable, which could provide a method reference for forest fire monitoring in China. © 2020, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：215 / 225
页数：10
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Allison R.S., Johnston J.M., Craig G., Jennings S., Airborne optical and thermal remote sensing for wildfire detection and monitoring, Sensors, 16, 8, (2016)
[2]  
Chen J., Zheng W., Liu C., Application of grassland fire monitoring based on Himawari-8 geostationary meteorological satellite data, Journal of Natural Disasters, 26, 4, pp. 197-204, (2017)
[3]  
Dennison P.E., Matheson D.S., Comparison of fire temperature and fractional area modeled from SWIR, MIR, and TIR multispectral and SWIR hyperspectral airborne data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 3, pp. 876-886, (2011)
[4]  
Giglio L., Schroeder W., Justice C.O., The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products, Remote Sensing of Environment, 178, pp. 31-41, (2016)
[5]  
He Q.J., Liu C., Improved algorithm of self-adaptive fire detection for MODIS data, Journal of Remote Sensing, 12, 3, pp. 448-453, (2008)
[6]  
He Y., Yang J., Ma Y., Liu J.B., Chen F., Li X.P., Yang Y.F., A method for fire detection using Landsat 8 data, Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 35, 5, (2016)
[7]  
Hu C.M., Bai Y., Tang P., Automatic cloud detection for GF-4 series images, Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, 1, pp. 132-142, (2018)
[8]  
Qin X.L., Yi H.R., A method to identify forest fire based on MODIS data, Fire Safety Science, 13, 2, pp. 83-89, (2004)
[9]  
Tian G.L., Liu Q.H., Chen L.F., Thermal Remote Sensing, pp. 478-520, (2014)
[10]  
Wang W.T., Qu J.J., Hao X.J., Sommers W.T., An improved algorithm for small and cool fire detection using MODIS data: a preliminary study in the southeastern United States, Remote Sensing of Environment, 108, 2, pp. 163-170, (2007)
12