Conceptualizing Smart Government: Interrelations and Reciprocities with Smart City

被引:3
作者
Anthopoulos L. [1 ]
Sirakoulis K. [1 ]
Reddick C.G. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Thessaly, Greece
[2] University of Texas at San Antonio, United States
来源
Digital Government: Research and Practice | 2021年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
digital government; e-government; open government; Smart city; smart governance; smart government;
D O I
10.1145/3465061
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Smart government (SG) is an emerging topic, which increasingly attracts attention from scholars who work in public administration, political, and information sciences. Smart city (SC) on the other hand, is an emerging and multidisciplinary domain of study. It is not clear whether the two terms SG and SC co-exist or concern different domains that interrelate and interact. The aim of this paper is to investigate the term SG; to conceptualize it with components; to define the importance of these components to the SG with their relative strengths; and to clarify its relationship with the SC term. In this respect, this paper follows a multi-method approach: a comprehensive literature review to define and conceptualize the SG, and determine its components, and a Delphi study for validating the literature findings and for calculating the relative components' strengths. The SG definitions that are in literature have several weaknesses and the authors proposed a definition to the SG that overcomes them, while a model with three rings, three dimensions and 13 components conceptualizes it. The Delphi study showed that all the SG conceptual entities are useful, and highlighted that Citizens Engagement, Economic Growth, and Accountability are more important compared to the others, but it is hard to decide about the less important component. Third, the ICT Innovation entity appears to be the most important compared to emerging technologies and data. Finally, SC and SG are indeed related but, SC is proved to be a complimentary part of the broader SG term. © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [31] Gil-Garcia J.R., Sayogo D.S., Government inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: Understanding the main determinants of success, Government Information Quarterly, (2016)
  • [32] Goldsmith S., Crawford S., The Responsive City: Engaging Communities Through Data-Smart Governance, (2014)
  • [33] Harsh A., Ichalkaranje N., Transforming e-government to smart government: A South Australian perspective, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1, pp. 9-16, (2015)
  • [34] Hashem I.A.T., Chang V., Anuar N.B., Adewole K., Yaqoob I., Gani A., Ahmed E., Chiroma H., The role of big data in smart city, International Journal of Information Management, 36, 5, pp. 748-758, (2016)
  • [35] Hope K.R., The new public management: Context and practice in Africa, International Public Management Journal, 4, pp. 119-134, (2001)
  • [36] Hu Y., Wang J., Building smart government or developing industry? Study on the designs of local smart city pilot projects in China, The Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o?16), Shanghai, China, (2016)
  • [37] ISO 37120:2014: Sustainable Development of Communities-Indicators for City Services and Quality of Life, (2014)
  • [38] Sustainable Development in Communities, (2016)
  • [39] Iwan A., Poon K.K.Y., The role of governments and green building councils in cities? transformation to become sustainable: Case studies of Hong Kong (east) and Vancouver (west, Int. J. Sus. Dev. Planning, 13, 4, pp. 556-570, (2018)
  • [40] Jansen A., Olnes S., The nature of public e-services and their quality dimensions, Government Information Quarterly, (2016)