A study of multi-objective optimization: focus on Knee

被引:0
作者
Li W.-H. [1 ]
Zhang T. [1 ,2 ]
Wang R. [1 ,2 ]
Wang L. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
[2] Hunan Key Laboratory of Multi-Energy System Intelligent Interconnection Technology, Changsha
[3] Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing
来源
Kongzhi Lilun Yu Yingyong/Control Theory and Applications | 2021年 / 38卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Evolutionary algorithm; Knee; Multi-objective optimization; User preferences;
D O I
10.7641/CTA.2021.00437
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-objective optimization algorithms (MOEAs) have been a hot spot in the field of evolutionary computation in recent years. Most MOEAs try to find the whole Pareto front of the problem. However, as the number of objectives increases, the algorithm requires a larger population to reasonably describe the whole Pareto front. Obviously, this not only increases the running time of the algorithm, but also increases the difficulty of selecting the final solution. Therefore, it is particularly important to focus on searching a specific area on the Pareto front, which has also attracted the attention of more and more scholars. The Knee point refers to the point with the greatest marginal utility on the Pareto front. Near this point, a small increase of an objective value will lead to a huge decline in at least one other objective value. So this point is usually considered as a point that is more attractive to decision makers without special preferences. This article aims to summarize the methods related to Knee search in multi-objective optimization, including Knee detection methods and retention strategies, benchmark problems, etc., and look forward to the future research work related to Knee search. © 2021, Editorial Department of Control Theory & Applications South China University of Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1144
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, Et al., A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 2, pp. 182-197, (2002)
  • [2] ZITZLER E, LAUMANNS M, THIELE L., SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm, TIK-Report, (2001)
  • [3] ZHANG Q, LI H., MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11, 6, pp. 712-731, (2007)
  • [4] BI Xiaojun, WANG Chao, A reference point constrained dominance-based NSGA-III algorithm, Control and Decision, 34, 2, pp. 369-379, (2019)
  • [5] ZITZLER E, KUNZLI S., Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search, Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, (2004)
  • [6] BEUME N, NAUJOKS B, EMMERICH M., SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 3, pp. 1653-1669, (2007)
  • [7] BADER J, ZITZLER E., Hyp E, An algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization, Evolutionary Computation, 19, 1, pp. 45-76, (2011)
  • [8] KUKKONEN S, LAMPINEN J., GDE3: The third evolution step of generalized differential evolution, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, (2005)
  • [9] KNOWLES J D, CORNE D W., M-PAES: A memetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 325-332, (2000)
  • [10] WANG H, JIAO L, YAO X., Two Arch2: An improved two-archive algorithm for many-objective optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 19, 4, pp. 524-541, (2015)