Effect of upper and lower arms diameters on aerodynamic uplift force of high-speed pantograph

被引:0
作者
Dai Z.-Y. [1 ]
Li T. [1 ]
Zhou N. [1 ]
Zhang J.-Y. [1 ]
Zhang W.-H. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Sichuan, Chengdu
来源
Jiaotong Yunshu Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering | 2022年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
aerodynamic uplift force; high-speed pantograph; lower arm; numerical simulation; upper arm; vehicle engineering;
D O I
10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2022.04.016
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The pantograph models for the upper arms with seven different diameters and those for the lower arms with seven different diameters were built, and the aerodynamic numerical simulations of pantographs were carried out. The aerodynamic uplift forces of pantographs were calculated by using the multi-body dynamics method, and the effects of the upper and lower arm diameters on the aerodynamic performances and aerodynamic uplift forces of pantographs were studied from the perspective of the aerodynamic force and flow field characteristics. Research results show that both the aerodynamic lift force of the upper arm and the aerodynamic uplift force of the pantograph are larger with the rise of the upper arm diameter and are smaller with the rise of the lower arm diameter under the knuckle-downstream operating conditions, but the effect of the lower arm diameter on the aerodynamic uplift force of the pantograph is small. Moreover, both the aerodynamic lift force of the upper arm and the aerodynamic uplift of the pantograph lessens with the increase of the upper arm diameter and raises with the increase of the lower arm diameter under the knuckle-upstream operating conditions. The aerodynamic resistance of the bar of the upper arm only accounts for 3%-10% of that of the upper arm, and the aerodynamic lift force accounts for 26%-55% of that of the upper arm under both the knuckle-downstream and knuckle-upstream operating conditions. The aerodynamic resistance of the bar of the lower arm accounts for 10%-25% of that of the lower arm, and the aerodynamic lift force accounts for 43%-68% of that of the lower arm under the two conditions. The change of diameter has a great influence on the aerodynamic lift forces of the upper and lower arms and a small effect on the aerodynamic resistances. In addition, the absolute values of the aerodynamic resistances of the upper and lower arms under the knuckle-upstream operating conditions are greater than those under the knuckle-downstream operating conditions. 16 figs, 31 refs. © 2022 Chang'an University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 222
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] GAO Guo-qiang, HAO Jing, WEI Wen-fu, Et al., Dynamics of pantograph-catenary arc during the pantograph lowering process, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 44, 99, pp. 2715-2723, (2016)
  • [2] ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Wei-hua, Dynamical performance simulation of the pantograph-catenary coupled system based on direct integration method, China Railway Science, 29, 6, pp. 71-76, (2008)
  • [3] MEI Gui-ming, ZHANG Wei-hua, Dynamics model and behavior of pantograph/catenary system, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2, 1, pp. 20-25, (2002)
  • [4] LI Rui-ping, ZHOU Ning, LYU Qing-song, Et al., Pantograph- catenary dynamic behavior under cross wind, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 33, 24, pp. 39-44, (2014)
  • [5] TOSHIAKI, MAKINO K, YOUSHIDA S, Et al., Running test on current collector with contact force controller for high-speed railways, JSME International Journal Series C, 40, 4, pp. 671-680, (1997)
  • [6] COLLINA A, FCCHINETTI A, FOSSATI F, Et al., Hardware in the loop test-rig for identification and control application on high speed pantographs, Shock and Vibration, 11, 3, pp. 2171-2176, (2004)
  • [7] XIE Jian, LIU Zhi-gang, HAN Zhi-wei, Et al., Pantograph and overhead contact line coupling dynamic model simulation and analysis of imbalance of overhead contact line, Electric Railway, 20, 6, pp. 23-26, (2009)
  • [8] WU Yan, WU Jun-yong, ZHENG Ji-hao, Simulation of high-speed pantograph dynamic performance based on finite element model and aerodynamic pantograph model, Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 44, 6, pp. 855-859, (2009)
  • [9] ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Wei-hua, LI Rui-ping, Dynamic performance of a pantograph catenary system with the consideration of the appearance characteristics of contact surfaces, Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A: Applied Physics and Engineering, 12, 12, pp. 913-920, (2011)
  • [10] LEE J H, KIM Y G, PAIK J S, Et al., Performance evaluation and design optimization using differential evolutionary algorithm of the pantograph for the high-speed train, Journal of Mechanical Scienceand Technology, 26, 10, pp. 3253-3260, (2012)