Dynamic response analysis of reticulated shells based on refined member model

被引:0
作者
Zhu Z. [1 ]
Luo Y. [2 ]
Qu Y. [2 ]
Huang Q. [2 ]
机构
[1] China Construction Five Engineering Division Civil Engineering Co., Ltd, Changsha
[2] School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
来源
Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures | 2020年 / 41卷 / 02期
关键词
Compressive buckling; Dynamic analysis; Member model; Reticulated shell; Shaking table test;
D O I
10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.0591
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To obtain the accurate dynamic response of a reticulated shell, the refined member model must be established which can simulate both tensile strengthening and compressive buckling. Based on the equivalent principle of energy consumption of hysteresis model, the equivalent Marshall model for the imperfect member loaded by the axial force was established. According to the parameter analysis, the influences of common parameter, including section parameters, the initial bending amplitude, the elastic modulus reduction factor and the slenderness ratio, on the coefficients of the equivalent Marshall model are discussed, and the calculation formulas of the equivalent coefficients were given. The shaking table test and finite element simulation were conducted on a scaled K6 reticulated shell model. The results show that the refined member model, based on the equivalent Marshall model, can accurately simulate the dynamic development of the force state of the component, and the average error of residual displacement between the calculation results and the test data is 13%, which is superior to traditional Marshall model and satisfies the accuracy requirement of the practical engineering application. Moreover, the member model without imperfection will overestimate the actual load-carrying capacity of the reticulated shell model. © 2020, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Gu L., Xiao K., Zhang J., Et al., Stability analysis and test research of single-layer latticed dome considering bar buckling, Journal of Building Structures, 38, 7, pp. 25-33, (2017)
[2]  
Li J., Xu J., Novel criterion for identification of dynamic stability of structures, Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 43, 7, pp. 965-971, (2015)
[3]  
Zhi X., Fan F., Qiao D., Research on complexity effect of super-large span reticulated dome under severe earthquakes, Journal of Building Structures, 37, 9, pp. 91-98, (2016)
[4]  
Xiang Y., Luo Y., Zhu Z., Et al., A procedure of elasto-plastic seismic response analysis of spatial structures based on design response spectra, Journal of Building Structures, 38, 9, pp. 74-83, (2017)
[5]  
Liew J.Y.R., Punniyakotty N.M., Shanmugam N.E., Advanced analysis and design of spatial structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 42, 1, pp. 21-48, (1997)
[6]  
Su C., Research on the limited capacity of rigid large-span steel space, (2006)
[7]  
Hill C., Blandford G., Wang S., Post-buckling analysis of steel space trusses, Journal of Structural Engineering, 115, 4, pp. 900-919, (1989)
[8]  
Dicleli M., Calik E.E., Physical theory hysteretic model for steel braces, Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 7, pp. 1215-1228, (2008)
[9]  
Zheng H.D., Fan J., Analysis of the progressive collapse of space truss structures during earthquakes based on a physical theory hysteretic model, Thin-Walled Structures, 123, pp. 70-81, (2018)
[10]  
Lee P.S., McClure G., Elastoplastic large deformation analysis of a lattice steel tower structure and comparison with full-scale tests, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63, pp. 709-717, (2007)