Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Various Examinations and Imaging Modes of Dentomaxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography

被引:0
作者
Toossi M.T.B. [1 ]
Zafari N. [1 ]
Hoseini-Zarch S.H. [2 ]
Dolat E. [1 ]
Azimian H. [1 ]
Moghadam M.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad
关键词
Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Dental Imaging; Maxillofacial; Radiation Dose; Signal To Noise Ratio;
D O I
10.22038/IJMP.2021.56040.1932
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Cone-beam computed tomography is used for specialized imaging of dental and maxillofacial structures. CBCTs capabilities and facilities for dental and maxillofacial imaging have resulted in their increasing clinical use. Although the dose of CBCT tests is low, its widespread use increases the cumulative dose. This study was conducted to evaluate head and neck effective dose and image quality in different organs for various exposure techniques in CBCT imaging. Material and Methods: This study was performed on various CBCT imaging examinations. Head and neck parts of anthropomorphic male Rando® Alderson Phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used for organ dosimetry. Contrast to noise ratio and signal to noise ratio were evaluated for image quality assessments. For this purpose, the region of the tooth and soft tissue images were randomly used as the basis. Results: Mean effective dose for face and paranasal sinuses imaging in three modes (standard, low-dose, ultra-low dose), temporomandibular imaging in two modes(standard & low dose), and dental imaging in implant and endo imaging modes was equal to 382.17, 193.97, 79.96, 262.6, 135.67, 53.93, 682.83, 335.75, 184.18, and 234.57 μSv, respectively. Signal -to -noise ratio (SNR) for the above-mentioned procedures was equal to 6.04, 5.73, 3.71, 6.3, 6.00, 4.08, 14.2, 12.3, 7.51, and 6.97, respectively. Conclusion: The present study showed, when low dose and ultra-low-dose modes are chosen, the patient’s dose will be severely reduced in most CBCT procedures. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and SNR will diminish too, but they are sufficient for some diagnostic purposes. © 2022
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Farman A.G., Scarfe W.C., The basics of maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography, Seminars in Orthodontics, (2009)
[2]  
Alamri HM, Sadrameli M, Alshalhoob MA, Alshehri MA., Applications of CBCT in dental practice: a review of the literature, General dentistry, 60, 5, pp. 390-400, (2012)
[3]  
Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J., Cone beam CT in dental practice, British dental journal, 207, 1, pp. 23-28, (2009)
[4]  
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Et al., Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications, European journal of radiology, 71, 3, pp. 461-468, (2009)
[5]  
White SC, Pharoah MJ., The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities, Dental Clinics of North America, 52, 4, pp. 689-705, (2008)
[6]  
C Cangul S, Adiguzel O., Cone-beam threedimensional dental volumetric tomography in dental practice, International Dental Research, 7, 3, pp. 62-70, (2017)
[7]  
Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS, Nanjannawar LG, Parushetti AD., CBCT in orthodontics: the wave of future, The journal of contemporary dental practice, 14, 1, (2013)
[8]  
Galicia JC, Kawilarang J, Tawil PZ., Clinical endodontic applications of cone beam-computed tomography in modern dental practice, Open Journal of Stomatology, 7, 7, pp. 314-326, (2017)
[9]  
Carter JB, Stone JD, Clark RS, Mercer JE., Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an overview of published indications and clinical usage in United States academic centers and oral and maxillofacial surgery practices, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 74, 4, pp. 668-679, (2016)
[10]  
Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M., Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 106, 1, pp. 106-114, (2008)