Effect of bionic sphere form on drag reduction of high-speed maglev train

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meng S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on the Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha
[2] Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety, Central South University, Changsha
[3] National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Safety Technology for Rail Vehicle, Central South University, Changsha
关键词
aerodynamic resistance; bionic sphere shape; high speed maglev train; slipstream; wake structure;
D O I
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2023.04.034
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using IDDES turbulence model based on SST k-ω equation, different bionic sphere structures were set at the streamlined part of the high-speed maglev train to simulate its drag reduction performance. The results show that the bionic sphere structure can not only effectively reduce the wake velocity and weaken the overall strength of the wake, but also restrict the development of the wake vortex and reduce the radiation range of the wake vortex. The sphere structure reduces the area of the high-speed flow area at the separation position of the tail car flow, effectively delays the burst of turbulence, reduces the turbulence intensity and narrows the thickness of the boundary layer. The bionic sphere structure has an adsorption effect on the slipstream, so that the high-speed area is concentrated closer to that of the nose of the tail car, and the velocity fluctuation of the wake becomes smaller. The difference of sphere shape has a great impact on the flow field structure. Compared with the convex spherical structure, the concave spherical structure has a more significant weakening effect on the wake intensity, a better effect on the boundary layer at the flow separation position, and a stronger adsorption capacity for slipstream. The setting of convex spherical structure and concave spherical structure can reduce the aerodynamic drag of the tail car by 7.64% and 14.58% respectively, but increases the aerodynamic drag of the head car by 2.33% and 1.16% respectively. © 2023 Central South University of Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1602
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] HUANG Ling, Review of rail transit industry development, China Basic Science, 20, 6, pp. 61-64, (2018)
  • [2] TIAN Hongqi, Study evolvement of train aerodynamics in China, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 6, 1, pp. 1-9, (2006)
  • [3] ZHANG Jie, WU Yuwei, GAO Jianyong, Et al., Numerical simulation of aeroacoustic characteristics of high-speed maglev train, Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 53, 10, pp. 4185-4196, (2022)
  • [4] TIAN Hongqi, Review of research on high-speed railway aerodynamics in China, Transportation Safety and Environment, 1, 1, pp. 1-21, (2019)
  • [5] YU Haowei, KOU Junyu, LI Yan, Adaptability and engineering development of 600 km/h high-speed maglev in China, Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 37, 12, pp. 16-20, (2020)
  • [6] ZHOU Xisai, LIU Tanghong, CHEN Zhengwei, Et al., Influence of head outlines on aerodynamic effect of two trains intersecting in tunnel, Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 49, 2, pp. 493-501, (2018)
  • [7] MULD T W, EFRAIMSSON G, HENNINGSON D S., Wake characteristics of high-speed trains with different lengths, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228, 4, pp. 333-342, (2014)
  • [8] ZHANG Liang, ZHANG Jiye, LI Tian, Et al., Multi-objective optimization design of the streamlined head shape of super high-speed train, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53, 2, pp. 106-114, (2017)
  • [9] LIN Chengxiang, Research on non-smooth drag reduction surface structure based on boundary layer theory, China Science and Technology Information, Z1, pp. 90-102, (2018)
  • [10] WALSH M, SELLERS I W, MCGINLEY C., Riblet drag reduction at flight conditions, 6th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, (1988)