Mini-Implants in Dentistry – A Review

被引：1

作者：

Duraisamy R. ^{[1
]}

Ganapathy D.M. ^{[1
]}

Rajeshkumar S. ^{[2
]}

Ashok V. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, 162, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai

[2] Nanobiomedicine Lab, Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, SIMATS, Saveetha University, Chennai

来源：

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants | 2022年 / 32卷 / 03期

关键词：

anchorage; animal models; loading; mini-implants; orthodontics; prosthodontics;

D O I：

10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022041814

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Mini-implants were introduced as an alternative to standard implants for use in narrow alveolar ridges due to their smaller length and size. They are also used to provide anchorage in orthodontic treatments. Mini-implants offer simplified treatment procedures with a flat learning curve, low cost, and a possible flapless surgical procedure that can decrease post-surgical morbidity. Before being implemented into clinical practice, they were subjected to in vivo testing using animal models as is with all implant research. The biomechanical properties of mini-implants have earned them a high rate of acceptance in treatment among patients. In this review, we focus on mini-implants, extrapolation from mini-implant testing on animal models, and their latest use in dentistry. © 2022 by Begell House, Inc.

引用

页码：29 / 37

页数：8

共 57 条

[21]

Honig JF., Das Gottinger Miniaturschwein (GMS) als Versuchstier in der humanmedizinischen osteolo-gischen Grundlagenforschung, Z Zahnarztl Implantol, 9, pp. 244-254, (1993)

[22]

Ma J-L, Pan J-L, Tan B-S, Cui F-Z., Determination of critical size defect of minipig mandible, J Tissue Eng Re-gen Med, 3, 8, pp. 615-622, (2009)

[23]

Standard B., Biological evaluation of medical devices, Biol Eval Med devices, pp. 10993-1, (2003)

[24]

Wen B, Karl M, Pendrys D, Shafer D, Freilich M, Kuhn L., An evaluation of BMP-2 delivery from scaffolds with miniaturized dental implants in a novel rat mandible model, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 97, 2, pp. 315-326, (2011)

[25]

Shimizu-Ishiura M, Tanaka S, Lee WS, Debari K, Sa-saki T., Effects of enamel matrix derivative to titanium implantation in rat femurs, J Biomed Mater Res, 60, 2, pp. 269-276, (2002)

[26]

Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B., Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: A histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction, Eur J Orthod, 31, 1, pp. 21-29, (2009)

[27]

Kim S-H, Lee S-J, Cho I-S, Kim S-K, Kim T-W., Rotational resistance of surface-treated mini-implants, Angle Orthod, 79, 5, pp. 899-907, (2009)

[28]

Pithon MM, Figueiredo DSF, Oliveira DD., Mechani-cal evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 71, 3, pp. 479-486, (2013)

[29]

Vilani GNL, Ruellas AC de O, Elias CN, Mattos CT., Sta-bility of smooth and rough mini-implants: Clinical and biomechanical evaluation-an in vivo study, Dental Press J Orthod, 20, 5, pp. 35-42, (2015)

[30]

Shin YS, Ahn HW, Park YG, Kim SH, Chung KR, Cho IS, Nelson G., Effects of predrilling on the osseointe-gration potential of mini-implants, Angle Orthod, 82, 6, pp. 1008-1013, (2012)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →