Executive compensation limit and enterprise performance: Evidence from natural experiment of pay ceiling order

被引:0
作者
Yang Y. [1 ]
Li Y. [1 ]
Yin Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Finance, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing
来源
Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice | 2019年 / 39卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Difference-in-differences; Enterprise performance; Pay ceiling order; Propensity score matching;
D O I
10.12011/1000-6788-2019-0924-14
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on the natural experiment of the "central management enterprise salary system reform" (pay ceiling order), which was implemented on January 1, 2015, this paper empirically examines the impact of policy on the performance of listed state-owned enterprises. By using the difference-in-differences (DID) model and propensity score matching (PSM) method, we find that "pay ceiling order" has a negative effect on the operating performance of listed companies. Further studies on the dynamic effect of "pay ceiling order" show that the second year is more significant than the first year after implementation. It is also found that the policy has the heterogeneity influence on the performance of different types of enterprises. Results show that performance of central government-owned, high compensation and large-scale enterprises declined more comparing to the local government-owned, low pay and small-scale enterprises. Our findings suggest that executive compensation system of state-owned enterprises should follow the enterprise features and market-oriented reform should be accelerated to maximize the enterprise value. © 2019, Editorial Board of Journal of Systems Engineering Society of China. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3024 / 3037
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Fang J.X., Managerial power and asymmetry of compensation change in China's public companies, Economic Research Journal, 4, pp. 107-120, (2011)
[2]  
Liu X., Xu G.W., Government regulation, management power and rigidity of management compensation, Economic Science, 1, pp. 87-102, (2012)
[3]  
Xu X.X., Liu X., Decentralization reform, compensation control and corruption of top management, Management World, 3, pp. 119-132, (2013)
[4]  
Sheny F., Li P.G., Empirical research on the impact of "pay ceiling order" on the CEO compensation and pay-for-luck phenomenon, China Industrial Economics, 11, pp. 130-139, (2010)
[5]  
Wang C.E., Wei W.L., The evaluation of the performance of pay ceiling order, Journal of Regional Financial Research, 5, pp. 76-81, (2013)
[6]  
Core J.E., Holthausen R.W., Larcker D.F., Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 3, pp. 371-406, (1999)
[7]  
Bushman R.M., Smith A.J., Financial accounting information and cooperate governance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 1, pp. 237-333, (2001)
[8]  
Jackson S.B., Lopez T.J., Reitenga A.L., Accounting fundamental and CEO bonus compensation, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 5, pp. 374-393, (2008)
[9]  
Niu X.Q., Xie K., Gu H., Et al., Research on long-term and short-term performance task and agent's compensation incentive based on fairness preference, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 39, 2, pp. 372-386, (2019)
[10]  
Bebchuk L.A., Fried J.M., Executive compensation as an agency problem, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 3, pp. 71-92, (2003)