CO2 Emissions Characteristics and Source Analysis of "Chinese Style" Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Route

被引：5
作者：
Na H.-M. [1 ,2 ]
Gao C.-K. [1 ,2 ]
Guo Y.-H. [3 ]
Tian F. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[2] SEP Key Laboratory of Eco-industry, Northeastern University, Shenyang
[3] State Key Laboratory of Advanced Steel Processes and Products, Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, Beijing
来源：
Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University | 2019年 / 40卷 / 02期
关键词：
Chinese style" electric arc furnace steelmaking route; CO[!sub]2[!/sub] emissions; Emission factor method; Hot metal; Scrap steel index;
D O I：
10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2019.02.012
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Electric arc furnace steelmaking route does not play the role of carbon reduction in China due to the excessive use of hot metal. This unique route is called the "Chinese style" electric arc furnace steelmaking route. Employing the emission factor method, the Sankey diagram of CO2 emissions of "Chinese style" electric arc furnace steelmaking route is built to explore the path of carbon emissions. The results show that the CO2 emissions per ton of steel in the whole route are 3.070 t, among which the CO2 emissions from electric arc furnace steelmaking takes the largest share of 1.400 t. Particularly, excessive CO2 emissions of 1.419 t are produced because of the utilization of hot metal for electric arc furnace steelmaking. The reason for the excessive use of hot metal is that China's steel industry is in the developing period, the scrap steel index is low, the recovery and utilization system of scrap steel is incomplete and the price of industrial electricity is high. © 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of Northeastern University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：212 / 217
页数：5
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Na H.M., Gao C.K., Zhang M.H., Et al., Life cycle assessment analysis of the environment load from typical Chinese steel enterprises, Journal of Environmental Accounting & Management, 5, 1, pp. 1-9, (2017)
  • [2] World Steel Statistics 2017, (2017)
  • [3] Yang N.-C., Huang Q.-M., He L.-M., Current situation and outlook of steelmaking compact process technology domestic and overseas, China Steel, 4, pp. 17-22, (2010)
  • [4] Gao C.-K., Chen S., Chen S., Et al., Carbon footprint analysis of typical Chinese iron and steel enterprises, Steel, 50, 3, pp. 1-8, (2015)
  • [5] Na H.M., Gao C.K., Tian M.Y., Et al., MFA-based analysis of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from typical industry in urban-as a case of steel industry, Ecological Modelling, 365, pp. 45-54, (2017)
  • [6] Das A., Kandpal T.C., Iron and steel manufacturing technologies in India: estimation of CO<sub>2</sub> emission, International Journal of Energy Research, 21, 12, pp. 1187-1201, (2015)
  • [7] Xu W.Q., Cao W.J., Zhu T.Y., Et al., Material flow analysis of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from blast furnace and basic oxygen furnace steelmaking systems in China, Steel Research International, 86, 9, pp. 1063-1072, (2015)
  • [8] Ran R., Weng D., Current situation of CO<sub>2</sub> emission in iron and steel producing and its controlling methods, Science & Technology Review, 24, 10, pp. 53-56, (2006)
  • [9] Ariyama T., Sato M., Optimization of ironmaking process for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the integrated steel works, ISIJ International, 46, 12, pp. 1736-1744, (2006)
  • [10] Xu C.B., Cang D.Q., A brief overview of low CO<sub>2</sub> emission technologies for iron and steel making, Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 17, 3, pp. 1-7, (2010)
12