Research on carbon footprint reduction and smart pricing decision-making system of green energy consumption

被引：0
作者：
Liu Z. [1 ]
Hu B. [1 ]
Lang L.-L. [1 ]
Guo H.-X. [1 ]
Sun J.-Y. [2 ]
Florence K.
机构：
[1] School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai
[2] School of Engineering and Technology, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin
来源：
International Journal of Environment and Pollution | 2022年 / 69卷 / 3-4期
关键词：
carbon footprint; centralised decisions; complex structures; decentralised decisions; decision-making systems; green energy products; power structures; smart pricing; Stackelberg game;
D O I：
10.1504/ijep.2021.126977
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Reducing carbon footprint is one of the important purposes of green energy consumption. The paper takes the secondary supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer as the research object, and firstly analyses the influence of the supply chain structure on the optimal decision of the game when the supply chain members have different gaming capabilities, by consideration of the optimal total profit of the supply chain system under centralised and decentralised decisions, optimal decision model of supply chain (RS model) under Retailer-Stackelberg game and the decision model of producer and retailer (N model) under Nash game are established. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of the optimal wholesale price, the optimal carbon footprint of products, and the retailer’s optimal sales price under the two games are compared. Copyright © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：261 / 276
页数：15
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Al-Mansour F., Jejcic V., A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: the case of Slovenia, Energy, 136, pp. 7-15, (2016)
  • [2] Alvarez S., Sosa M., Rubio A., Product and corporate carbon footprint using the compound method based on financial accounts, The Case of Osorio Wind Farms, 139, pp. 196-204, (2015)
  • [3] Bai Q.G., Xu J.T., Satyaveer S., Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 142, (2020)
  • [4] Benjaafar S., Li Y., Daskin M., Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering, 10, 1, pp. 99-116, (2013)
  • [5] Cachon G.P., Supply Chain Design and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, (2011)
  • [6] Cheng Y.H., Xiong Z.K., Product carbon foot print and pricing decisions and coordination under carbon labelling system, Journal of Systems Engineering, 31, 3, pp. 386-397, (2016)
  • [7] Demertzi M., Paulo J.A., Arroja L., Dias A.C., A carbon footprint simulation model for the cork oak sector, Science of the Total Environment, Vols. 566–567, pp. 499-511, (2016)
  • [8] Du S.F., Hu L., Wang L., Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand, Annals of Operations Research, 255, 1–2, pp. 569-590, (2017)
  • [9] Gan Y., Liang C., Hamel C., Cutforth H., Wang H., Strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of field crops for semiarid areas. A review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31, 4, pp. 643-656, (2011)
  • [10] Haddadsisakht A., Ryan S.M., Closed-loop supply chain network design with multiple transportation modes under stochastic demand and uncertain carbon tax, International Journal of Production Economics, 195, C, pp. 118-131, (2018)
12