Effect of Enamel Matrix Derivative and N-Acetyl Cysteine on Proliferation and Osteogenic Activity of Dental Pulp Stem Cells

被引:0
作者
Amid R. [1 ]
Alamdari M.I. [2 ]
Kadkhodazadeh M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
[3] Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
关键词
acetylcysteine; bone regeneration; stem cells; tissue engineering;
D O I
10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022040074
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Successful bone regeneration often requires induction by signaling molecules. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is said to enhance initial phases of healing. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a molecule assumed to enhance osteogenesis and induce osteoblastic differentiation. This study sought to compare effects of EMD and NAC on proliferation, mineralization, and enzymatic activity of dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs). DPSCs were cultured on mineralized bone allograft (MBA) powder. After 24 hours, EMD in concentrations of 10, 50, and 100 µg/mL and NAC in 5 mM concentration were added. Methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay was used for cell proliferation assessment at 1, 2, and 3 days. Osteoblastic differentiation of DPSCs was evaluated at 30 days, by alizarin red staining and assessment of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Both EMD and NAC caused time-de-pendent reduction of cell proliferation compared with the negative control. Maximum proliferation of DPSCs was observed in the 10 µg/mL EMD group at all time points, whereas NAC caused higher ALP activity and mineralization of DPSCs compared with EMD. In vitro application of NAC, as a signaling molecule, may effectively enhance bone regeneration by the induction of mineralization and enzymatic activity, despite the resultant reduction in cell proliferation rate. © 2022 by Begell House, Inc. www.begellhouse.com.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Yamada M, Tsukimura N, Ikeda T, Sugita Y, Att W, Ko-jima N, Kubo K, Ueno T, Sakurai K, Ogawa T., N-acetyl cysteine as an osteogenesis-enhancing molecule for bone regeneration, Biomaterials, 34, 26, pp. 6147-6156, (2013)
[2]  
Rose FR, Oreffo RO., Bone tissue engineering: Hope vs. hype, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 292, 1, pp. 1-7, (2002)
[3]  
Hama H, Azuma H, Seto H, Kido J, Nagata T., Inhibitory effect of enamel matrix derivative on osteoblastic differentiation of rat calvaria cells in culture, J Periodontol Res, 43, 2, pp. 179-185, (2008)
[4]  
Wada Y, Yamamoto H, Nanbu S, Mizuno M, Tamura M., The suppressive effect of enamel matrix derivative on osteocalcin gene expression of osteoblasts is neutral-ized by an antibody against TGF-beta, J Periodontol, 79, 2, pp. 341-347, (2008)
[5]  
Amin HD, Olsen I, Knowles JC, Donos N., Differen-tial effect of amelogenin peptides on osteogenic differentiation in vitro: Identification of possible new drugs for bone repair and regeneration, Tissue Eng Part A, 18, 11-12, pp. 1193-1202, (2012)
[6]  
Hughes FJ, Turner W, Belibasakis G, Martuscelli G., Effects of growth factors and cytokines on osteoblast differ-entiation, Periodontol 2000, 41, pp. 48-72, (2006)
[7]  
Jue SS, Lee WY, Kwon YD, Kim YR, Pae A, Lee B., The effects of enamel matrix derivative on the proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells, Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp. 741-746, (2010)
[8]  
Jiang SY, Shu R, Song ZC, Xie YF., Effects of enamel matrix proteins on proliferation, differentiation and at-tachment of human alveolar osteoblasts, Cell Prolif, 44, 4, pp. 372-379, (2011)
[9]  
Yamada M, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, Sato N, Iwasa F, Hori N, Ogawa T., N-acetyl cysteine alleviates cytotoxicity of bone substitute, J Dent Res, 89, 4, pp. 411-416, (2010)
[10]  
Jun JH, Lee SH, Kwak HB, Lee ZH, Seo SB, Woo KM, Ryoo HM, Kim GS, Baek JH., N-acetylcysteine stimulates osteoblastic differentiation of mouse calvarial cells, J Cell Biochem, 103, 4, pp. 1246-1255, (2008)