Effects of biochar and humic acid application on global warming potentials of CH4 and N2O in a rice-wheat rotation system

被引:0
作者
Liu Z. [1 ]
Liu J. [1 ]
Wu J. [1 ]
Li Y. [1 ]
Jiang P. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, College of Carbon Neutrality, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Lin’an 311300, China Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carb
来源
Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2023年 / 39卷 / 11期
关键词
biochar; GHGI; greenhouse gas; GWP; humic acid;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202302028
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biochar is one of the most important soil amendment materials. An ever increasingly prominent role can be found in carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas, especially in the methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) mitigation potential. Among them, humic acid amendments to the cropland have dominated the C, N cycling and yield. In this study, a systematic investigation was implemented to clarify the influencing mechanisms of the biochar and humic after one year of application on global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of CH4 and N2O emissions under a rice-wheat rotation system. A field experiment was designed with the double factors randomized block design in an acidic paddy of Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Six treatments were conducted in 2020 before the rice seedlings were transplanted as control without biochar or humic acid (B0F0), 0.6 t/hm2 humic acid without biochar (B0F1), 1.2 t/hm2 humic acid without biochar (B0F2), 20 t/hm2 biochar without humic acid (B1F0), 0.6 t/hm2 humic acid with 20 t/hm2 biochar (B1F1), and 1.2 t/hm2 humic acid with 20 t/hm2 biochar (B1F2). The CH4 and N2O emissions were then measured in the different treatments one year later in 2021-2022. An evaluation was also performed on the one-year field-aged biochar and humic acid amendment in a typical rice-wheat rotation system. The results showed that after application of one year 1) the biochar increased the soil organic carbon (SOC) content both in rice and wheat season; Humic acid significantly increased the SOC content in the rice season, whereas, there was no significant effect on the SOC in the wheat season. Meanwhile, there was no effect on rice yield in the application of biochar alone, humic acid alone and application of biochar and humic acid together, compared with the B0F0 treatment. The application of biochar and humic acid together significantly increased the wheat yield by 1.0%-5.0%. 2) The application of biochar and humic acid addition reduced the cumulative CH4 emissions by 11.1%, 21.8%-25.8% and 24.7%-34.1%, compared with the B0F0 treatment, but the cumulative N2O emissions were promoted by 33.3%, 10.0%-30.1% and 7.2%-23.7%, respectively. 3) The estimated gross GWP of CH4 plus N2O among the treatments was significantly reduced by the application of biochar and humic acid. The reason was attributed to the reduction of cumulative CH4 emissions. In addition, the biochar and humic acid addition significantly reduced the GHGI during the whole rice and wheat season, in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and yield. The application of biochar and humic acid reduced the GHGI by 10.2%, 17.3%-20.2%, and 27.2%-36.2%, respectively, compared with the B0F0 treatment. The lowest GWP and GHGI were achieved in the B1F1 treatment (biochar and humic acid were added at the rate of 20 and 0.6 t/hm2, respectively) among all the treatments. Consequently, outstanding performance can be expected in biochar and humic acid after the application of one year of the GHGs mitigation and carbon sequestration. A beneficial measure can also be utilized to improve the grain yields with less greenhouse gas emission in the rice-wheat rotation system. © 2023 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 229
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] STOCKER T F, QIN D, PLATTNER G K, Et al., The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change, (2013)
  • [2] FANG Qi, QIAN Lihua, LU Zhengwei, Measure carbon emission amount of China in the context of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, Environmental Protection, 49, 16, pp. 49-54, (2021)
  • [3] WANG F, YUE Z Z, ZHAO D Y, Et al., Improving energy and GHG performance of the rice-wheat rotation system: A life-cycle analysis based on a large-scale behavior investigation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, (2020)
  • [4] GAO B, HUANG T, JU X, Et al., Chinese cropping systems are a net source of greenhouse gases despite soil carbon sequestration, Global Change Biology, 24, 12, pp. 5590-5606, (2018)
  • [5] XU Renkou, Research progresses in soil acidification and its control, Soils, 47, 2, pp. 238-244, (2015)
  • [6] GUO J H, LIU X J, ZHANG Y, Et al., Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands, Science, 327, 5968, pp. 1008-1010, (2010)
  • [7] Huang Mingyi, Zhang Zhanyu, Zhai Yaming, Et al., Effects of biochar on coastal saline soil and maize yield under alternate irrigation with brackish and freshwater, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 21, pp. 88-96, (2020)
  • [8] Guan Fangyuan, Liu Chen, Fu Qinglin, Et al., Effects of straw addition on rice yield, soil carbon, nitrogen, and microbial community, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 12, pp. 223-230, (2020)
  • [9] WANG Hong, QIN Xiaobo, LI Yue, WANG Hong, Et al., Impact of biochar amendment on carbon emissions intensity in double rice field in South China, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 31, 5, pp. 226-234, (2015)
  • [10] WANG J, XIONG Z, KUZYAKOV Y., Biochar stability in soil: Meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects, Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 8, pp. 512-523, (2016)