Dual solution internal flow phenomenon and throttling characteristics of a supersonic variable inlet

被引:0
作者
Jin Y. [1 ]
Sun S. [2 ]
Guo Y. [1 ]
Tan H. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
[2] College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
来源
Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica | 2023年 / 44卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dual-solution phenomenon; shock train; supersonic variable inlet; throttling characteristics; wind tunnel test;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27134
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A supersonic variable inlet with an operating Mach number ranging from 0–4 was designed to investigate its internal flow structures and throttling characteristics. All tests were conducted in the wind tunnel at a freestream Mach number of 2. 9 with the aid of the high-speed schlieren and dynamic pressure data-acquisition systems. The results show that when the Internal Contraction Ratio(ICR)is 1. 79,the unthrottled internal flowfield of the inlet has the dual solution of designed and undesigned flow states. In the designed flow state,the wave system in the inlet internal duct is normally established;while in the undesigned flow state,there is a complex wave system induced by local separa⁃ tion in the inlet internal contraction part,resulting in its overall pressure rise higher than that of the designed flow state and the presence of broadband,low-frequency small-amplitude oscillations. In addition,the inlet downstream throttling performance in the designed and undesigned flow states is comparable with critical throttling ratios of 42. 4% and 41. 7% and critical pressure ratios of 15. 8 and 16. 0,respectively. During the downstream throttling process in both types of flow states,the disturbance propagates upstream in the form of an oblique terminal shock train,and the head wave of the shock train in the critical state is located just near the throat station. However,apparent differences exist in the spatial distribution characteristics and oscillatory features of the terminal shock train of the two flow states. © 2023 AAAS Press of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
SCHERRER R, GOWEN F E., Preliminary experimental investigation of a variable-area, variable-internal-contraction air inlet at Mach numbers between 1.42 and 2.44: NACA RM A55F23[R], (1955)
[2]  
ANDERSON W E., Investigation of the performance and internal flow of a variable-area,variable-internal-contraction inlet at Mach numbers of 2.00,2.50,and 2.92:NACA RM A58C24[R], (1958)
[3]  
Experimental investigation of starting process for a variable geometry air inlet operating from Mach 2 to Mach 8, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, (2006)
[4]  
YANAGI R., A study on pre-cooled turbojet-scramjet-rocket combined engines, 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, (1998)
[5]  
SANDERS B W, WEIR L J., Aerodynamic design of a dual-flow Mach 7 hypersonic inlet system for a turbine-based combined-cycle hypersonic propulsion system, (2008)
[6]  
CHEN B, GONG C L., Study on variable geometry inlet of acceleration hypersonic vehicle[J], Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 36, 4, pp. 431-436, (2013)
[7]  
WANG D P, Et al., Design and simulation of a dual-channel variable geometry turbine based combined cycle inlet[J], Journal of Aerospace Power, 30, 11, pp. 2695-2704, (2015)
[8]  
LI Y Z, LIU X W, ZHANG M Z,, Et al., Design of a two dimensional variable geometry inlet with Mach number 2.5-7.0[J], Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 41, 5, pp. 17-22, (2015)
[9]  
GUELHAN A., Analysis of a three-dimensional,high pressure ratio scramjet inlet with variable internal contraction, 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, (2012)
[10]  
LI B, WEI Z J,, CHI H W,, Et al., Effect of inlet internal contraction ratio on performance of solid fuel scramjet [J], Journal of Aerospace Power, 31, 2, pp. 459-466, (2016)