Agile self-selecting teams foster expertise coordination

被引:0
作者
Rejab M.M. [1 ]
Noble J. [2 ]
Marshall S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah
[2] Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington
来源
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management | 2019年 / 14卷
关键词
Agile software development; Expertise coordination; Grounded theory; Self-selecting teams;
D O I
10.28945/4280
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aim/Purpose This paper aims to discuss the activities involved in facilitating self-selecting teams for Agile software development projects. This paper also discussed how these activities can influence the successful expertise coordination in Agile teams. Background Self-selecting teams enable Agile team members to choose teams based on whom they prefer to work with. Good team bonding allows Agile team members to rely on each other in coordinating their expertise resources effectively. This is the focal point where expertise coordination is needed in Agile teams. Methodology This study employed Grounded Theory by interviewing 48 Agile practitioners from different software organizations mainly based in New Zealand. This study also carried out several sessions of observations and document analysis in conjunction with interviews. Contribution This study contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying the way self-selecting teams support expertise coordination. Findings Our findings indicated that the activities involved tend to influence the successful expertise coordination in Agile teams. Self-selecting teams are essential to supporting expertise coordination by increasing inter-dependencies between Agile team members, ensuring a diverse range of knowledge and skills in teams. Recommendations The self-selecting team activities can be used as a guideline for Agile software for Practitioners organizations in forming self-selecting teams in the fastest and most efficient way. It is vital for management to facilitate the process of self-selecting teams in order to optimize successful expertise coordination. Recommendations There is potential for further Grounded Theory research to explore more for Researchers activities and strategies involved in self-selecting teams. Impact on Society Self-selecting teams in Agile software developments projects tend to boost the productivity of software development. Future Research Several hypotheses can be tested through a deductive approach in future studies. © 2019 Informing Science Institute. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 117
页数:18
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Abrahamsson P., Conboy K., Wang X., Lots done, more to do’: The current state of agile systems development research, European Journal of Information Systems, 18, (2009)
[2]  
Allan G., A critique of using grounded theory as a research method, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2, 1, pp. 1-10, (2003)
[3]  
Akgun A.E., Byrne J.C., Keskin H., Lynn G.S., Transactive memory system in new product development teams, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 1, pp. 95-111, (2006)
[4]  
Akgun A.E., Byrne J., Keskin H., Lynn G.S., Imamoglu S.Z., Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective, Information & Management, 42, 8, pp. 1105-1120, (2005)
[5]  
Baker S.E., Edwards R., Doidge M., How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research, National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, (2012)
[6]  
Blankenship M., How to introduce self-forming teams to your organization, GitPrime Blog: Perspectives in Engineering, (2018)
[7]  
Birks M., Mills J., Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide, (2011)
[8]  
Bowen G., Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 2, pp. 27-40, (2009)
[9]  
Charmaz K., Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, (2006)
[10]  
Cockburn A., Highsmith J., Agile software development, the people factor, Computer, 34, 11, pp. 131-133, (2001)